Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 226.370 (2026)

Notice and conduct of sale of excess land

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      226.370 Notice and conduct of sale of excess land. Before selling the neighboring lands or property acquired under ORS 226.320 to 226.360, or any part thereof or any right or interest therein, the municipal authorities of the city shall give a notice of such sale by publication for five successive days in one or more daily newspapers of the city having a general circulation therein and by posting a similar notice in two conspicuous places in or upon the property described and referred to in the notice. The notice shall describe the property to be sold and shall state any restrictions under which the property will be sold and the terms of sale. The notice shall further state that sealed proposals will be received by an officer of the city named in the notice at the office of the officer for such purchase until the day and hour named therein. At the time appointed, such municipal authority shall open the proposals and shall either award to the highest responsible bidder for the purchase of the property; or at their discretion, reject any or all bids, and readvertise in the manner provided in this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1984 · leading case: Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of Portland, 650 P.2d 135 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of Portland, 650 P.2d 135 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 6× “Plaintiffs contend that the land transfer violated ORS 226.370, Section 3.96.060 of the Portland City Code and certain statewide planning goals.”
Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of Portland, 676 P.2d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 19× “The trial court granted defendants’ motion and entered a judgment declaring that ORS 226.370 does not apply to the exchange of land between the City of Portland and co-defendant Warren and that Portland City Code § 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.