Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672 (2026)

Unfair labor practices; complaints; filing fees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      243.672 Unfair labor practices; complaints; filing fees. (1) It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following:

      (a) Interfere with, restrain or coerce employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.662.

      (b) Dominate, interfere with or assist in the formation, existence or administration of any employee organization.

      (c) Discriminate in regard to hiring, tenure or any terms or condition of employment for the purpose of encouraging or discouraging membership in an employee organization. Nothing in this section is intended to prohibit the entering into of a fair-share agreement between a public employer and the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. If a “fair-share” agreement has been agreed to by the public employer and exclusive representative, nothing prohibits the deduction of the payment-in-lieu-of-dues from the salaries or wages of the employees.

      (d) Discharge or otherwise discriminate against an employee because the employee has signed or filed an affidavit, petition or complaint or has given information or testimony under ORS 243.650 to 243.809.

      (e) Refuse to bargain collectively in good faith with the exclusive representative.

      (f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.650 to 243.809.

      (g) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations including an agreement to arbitrate or to accept the terms of an arbitration award, where previously the parties have agreed to accept arbitration awards as final and binding upon them.

      (h) Refuse to reduce an agreement, reached as a result of collective bargaining, to writing and sign the resulting contract.

      (i) Violate ORS 243.670 (2).

      (j) Attempt to influence an employee to resign from or decline to obtain membership in a labor organization.

      (k) Encourage an employee to revoke an authorization for the deductions described under ORS 243.806.

      (2) Subject to the limitations set forth in this subsection, it is an unfair labor practice for a public employee or for a labor organization or its designated representative to do any of the following:

      (a) Interfere with, restrain or coerce any employee in or because of the exercise of any right guaranteed under ORS 243.650 to 243.809.

      (b) Refuse to bargain collectively in good faith with the public employer if the labor organization is an exclusive representative.

      (c) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.650 to 243.809.

      (d) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations, including an agreement to arbitrate or to accept the terms of an arbitration award, where previously the parties have agreed to accept arbitration awards as final and binding upon them.

      (e) Refuse to reduce an agreement, reached as a result of collective bargaining, to writing and sign the resulting contract.

      (3) It is an unfair labor practice for any labor organization to engage in unconventional strike activity not protected for private sector employees under the National Labor Relations Act on June 6, 1995. This provision applies to sitdown, slowdown, rolling, intermittent or on-and-off again strikes.

      (4) It is an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents to picket or cause, induce, or encourage to be picketed, or threaten to engage in such activity, at the residence or business premises of any individual who is a member of the governing body of a public employer, with respect to a dispute over a collective bargaining agreement or negotiations over employment relations, if an objective or effect of such picketing is to induce another person to cease doing business with the governing body member’s business or to cease handling, transporting or dealing in goods or services produced at the governing body’s business. For purposes of this subsection, a member of the Legislative Assembly is a member of the governing body of a public employer when the collective bargaining negotiation or dispute is between the State of Oregon and a labor organization. The Governor and other statewide elected officials are not considered members of a governing body for purposes of this subsection. Nothing in this subsection may be interpreted or applied in a manner that violates the right of free speech and assembly as protected by the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Oregon.

      (5) It is not an unfair labor practice or a violation of subsection (2)(a) of this section for the exclusive representative of an appropriate bargaining unit to charge the following employees in the unit reasonable fees and costs for representation that are unrelated to the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement, provided that the employees are not members of the labor organization that is the exclusive representative and have not voluntarily entered into a fair-share agreement:

      (a) A police officer of a city or municipal police department;

      (b) A sheriff or deputy sheriff;

      (c) A police officer commissioned by a university under ORS 352.121 or 353.125;

      (d) An employee of the Department of Corrections or of Oregon Corrections Enterprises; or

      (e) A parole or probation officer who supervises adult offenders.

      (6) An injured party may file a written complaint with the Employment Relations Board not later than 180 days following the occurrence of an unfair labor practice. For each unfair labor practice complaint filed, a fee of $300 is imposed. For each answer to an unfair labor practice complaint filed with the board, a fee of $300 is imposed. The board may allow any other person to intervene in the proceeding and to present testimony. A person allowed to intervene shall pay a fee of $300 to the board. The board may, in its discretion, order fee reimbursement to the prevailing party in any case in which the complaint or answer is found to have been frivolous or filed in bad faith. The board shall deposit fees received under this section to the credit of the Employment Relations Board Administrative Account. [1973 c.536 §4; 1995 c.286 §2; 2007 c.296 §1; 2011 c.593 §2; 2013 c.663 §6; 2019 c.429 §11; 2019 c.439 §1; 2023 c.47 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 204 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017). · cites it 50× “As relevant to this case, a public employer or its desig- nated representative commits an unfair labor practice if the employer or representative “interfere[s] with, restrain[s] or coerce[s] employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.”
Ass'n of Oregon Corr. Employees v. State, 295 P.3d 38 (Or. 2013). · cites it 30× “The parties also may use ORS 243.672 to address alleged contract violations.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 20× “* * *" Unfair labor practices are defined at ORS 243.672. The portions cited by AFSCME make it an unfair labor practice to: "(f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.”
Ahern v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 988 P.2d 364 (Or. 1999). · cites it 17× “) As the following discussion reveals, we agree with plaintiffs concession. The question is whether plaintiff nonetheless can avoid ERB’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.”
Vaandering v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1194 (Or. 2016). · cites it 14× “However, for us to resolve the issue that she raises, we would have to decide the relationship between the specific unfair labor practice set out in ORS 243.”
Portland State Univ. Chapter of the Am. Ass'n of Univ. Professors v. Portland State Univ., 291 P.3d 658 (Or. 2012). · cites it 6× “OPEU, 329 Or 428, 434-35 , 988 P2d 364 (1999) (recognizing that ERB has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether an unfair labor practice has been committed under ORS 243.672). The legislature further has empowered ERB to impose remedies when it finds that an unfair labor…”
Oregon Univ. Sys. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 60 P.3d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “ORS 243.672(2) provides, in part: “Subject to the limitations set forth in this subsection, it is an unfair labor practice for a public employee or for a labor organization or its designated representative to do any of the following: “* * * * * “(d) Violate the provisions of any…”
Shockey v. City of Portland, 837 P.2d 505 (Or. 1992). · cites it 6× “ORS 243.672(1)(g) provides: "(1) It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: "* * * * * "(g) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations[.”
Wy'East Educ. Ass'n v. Oregon Trail Sch. Dist. No. 46, 260 P.3d 626 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 22× “As relevant here, the association alleged that the district violated the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) — specifically ORS 243.672(l)(a), (b), and (e) (set out below) — by improperly deducting health insurance premiums normally paid by the district from…”
Portland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 43 v. City of Portland, 45 P.3d 162 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “NOTES [1] ORS 243.672 provides, in part: "(1) It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: "* * * * * "(g) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations including an…”
Portland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 43, IAFF v. City of Portland, 263 P.3d 1040 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 9× “1 ORS 243.672(1) provides, in part: “It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: “(e) Refuse to bargain collectively in good faith with the exclusive representative.”
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employes Union, 832 P.2d 36 (Or. 1992). · cites it 6× “ERB concluded that OPEU had violated ORS 243.672(2)(a) and (c) by failing to meet the Chicago Teachers Union v.”
Show all 204 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1) — 49 cases
Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017). “As relevant to this case, a public employer or its desig- nated representative commits an unfair labor practice if the employer or representative “interfere[s] with, restrain[s] or coerce[s] employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.”
Salem Police Employees Union v. City of Salem, 781 P.2d 335 (Or. 1989).
Portland State Univ. Chapter of the Am. Ass'n of Univ. Professors v. Portland State Univ., 291 P.3d 658 (Or. 2012). “OPEU, 329 Or 428, 434-35 , 988 P2d 364 (1999) (recognizing that ERB has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether an unfair labor practice has been committed under ORS 243.672). The legislature further has empowered ERB to impose remedies when it finds that an unfair labor…”
South Benton Educ. Ass'n v. Monroe Union High Sch. Dist. 1, 732 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
Ahern v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 988 P.2d 364 (Or. 1999). “) As the following discussion reveals, we agree with plaintiffs concession. The question is whether plaintiff nonetheless can avoid ERB’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(a) — 14 cases
Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017). “As relevant to this case, a public employer or its desig- nated representative commits an unfair labor practice if the employer or representative “interfere[s] with, restrain[s] or coerce[s] employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.”
Clackamas Cnty. Employees' Assn. v. Clackamas Cnty., 480 P.3d 993 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
Vaandering v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1194 (Or. 2016). “However, for us to resolve the issue that she raises, we would have to decide the relationship between the specific unfair labor practice set out in ORS 243.”
Portland Ass'n of Teachers v. Multnomah Sch. Dist. No. 1, 16 P.3d 1189 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
Washington Cnty. Police Officers Ass'n v. Washington Cnty., 873 P.2d 432 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(a)(b) — 1 case
Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of Medford, 605 P.2d 289 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(a)(b)(c) — 1 case
Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of Medford, 605 P.2d 289 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(b) — 1 case
Oregon Pub. Employees Union v. State Corr. Dep't, 839 P.2d 276 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(c) — 10 cases
Vaandering v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1194 (Or. 2016). “However, for us to resolve the issue that she raises, we would have to decide the relationship between the specific unfair labor practice set out in ORS 243.”
Stines v. Oregon State Employes Ass'n, 601 P.2d 799 (Or. 1979).
Crumpton v. Kulongoski, 873 P.2d 314 (Or. 1994).
Lane Cnty. v. State, 801 P.2d 870 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Portland State Univ. Chapter of the Am. Ass'n of Univ. Professors v. Portland State Univ., 246 P.3d 1162 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(e) — 36 cases
Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 503 v. Univ. of Or., 419 P.3d 779 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
Springfield Educ. Ass'n v. Springfield Sch. Dist. No. 19, 547 P.2d 647 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
Serv. Employees Int'l Union Local 503 v. U of O, 494 P.3d 993 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Lincoln Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lincoln Cnty. Sch. Dist., 67 P.3d 951 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
Portland Fire Fighters' Assn. v. City of Portland, 461 P.3d 1001 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(f) — 6 cases
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “* * *" Unfair labor practices are defined at ORS 243.672. The portions cited by AFSCME make it an unfair labor practice to: "(f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.”
George-Buckley v. Medford Sch. Dist. 549C, 509 P.3d 738 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
Airport Fire Fighters' Assn. v. Port of Portland, 329 Or. App. 545 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Carlson v. AFSCME, 700 P.2d 260 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of Medford, 605 P.2d 289 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(g) — 36 cases
Shockey v. City of Portland, 837 P.2d 505 (Or. 1992). “ORS 243.672(1)(g) provides: "(1) It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: "* * * * * "(g) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations[.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “* * *" Unfair labor practices are defined at ORS 243.672. The portions cited by AFSCME make it an unfair labor practice to: "(f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.”
Washington Cnty. Police Officers' Ass'n v. Washington Cnty., 63 P.3d 1167 (Or. 2003).
Portland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 43 v. City of Portland, 45 P.3d 162 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “NOTES [1] ORS 243.672 provides, in part: "(1) It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: "* * * * * "(g) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations including an…”
Harrisburg Educ. Ass'n v. Harrisburg Sch. Dist. 7, 63 P.3d 1176 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(h) — 2 cases
Oregon Ass'n of Classified Employees v. Salem-Keizer Sch. Dist. 24J, 767 P.2d 1365 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
Cascade Bargaining Council v. Jefferson Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 509-J, 732 P.2d 54 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1)(i) — 3 cases
United Academics of OSU v. OSU, 502 P.3d 254 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
East Cnty. Bargaining Council v. Centennial Sch. Dist. No. 28JT, 685 P.2d 452 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
AFSCME Local 2975 v. City of Corvallis, 752 P.2d 860 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(1Xa) — 1 case
Harrison v. Cent. Linn Sch. Dist. No. 552-C, 578 P.2d 460 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2) — 11 cases
Oregon Univ. Sys. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 60 P.3d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “ORS 243.672(2) provides, in part: “Subject to the limitations set forth in this subsection, it is an unfair labor practice for a public employee or for a labor organization or its designated representative to do any of the following: “* * * * * “(d) Violate the provisions of any…”
Coleman v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 694 P.2d 555 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
Ahern v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 988 P.2d 364 (Or. 1999). “) As the following discussion reveals, we agree with plaintiffs concession. The question is whether plaintiff nonetheless can avoid ERB’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.”
Ous v. Opeu, 60 P.3d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
Reynolds Sch. Dist. v. Oregon Sch. Employees Ass'n, 650 P.2d 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(a) — 8 cases
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employes Union, 832 P.2d 36 (Or. 1992). “ERB concluded that OPEU had violated ORS 243.672(2)(a) and (c) by failing to meet the Chicago Teachers Union v.”
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 793 P.2d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Coleman v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 694 P.2d 555 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
Vaandering v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1194 (Or. 2016). “However, for us to resolve the issue that she raises, we would have to decide the relationship between the specific unfair labor practice set out in ORS 243.”
Jefferson Cnty. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 23 P.3d 401 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(b) — 6 cases
Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard Sch. Dist. 23J, 840 P.2d 657 (Or. 1992).
Portland Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of Portland, 751 P.2d 770 (Or. 1988).
Jefferson Cnty. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 23 P.3d 401 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard Sch. Dist. 23J, 808 P.2d 101 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
Multnomah Cnty. Corr. Deputy Ass'n v. Multnomah Cnty., 308 P.3d 230 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(c) — 9 cases
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 793 P.2d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Trees v. Serv. Employees Int'l Union Local 503 (D. Or. 2025).
Trees v. Serv. Employees Int'l Union Local 503 (D. Or. 2021).
Carlson v. AFSCME, 700 P.2d 260 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
Johnson v. Portland Assn. of Teachers, 346 Or. App. 561 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(d) — 8 cases
Oregon Univ. Sys. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 60 P.3d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “ORS 243.672(2) provides, in part: “Subject to the limitations set forth in this subsection, it is an unfair labor practice for a public employee or for a labor organization or its designated representative to do any of the following: “* * * * * “(d) Violate the provisions of any…”
Ous v. Opeu, 60 P.3d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
Ass'n of Oregon Corr. Employees v. State, 295 P.3d 38 (Or. 2013). “The parties also may use ORS 243.672 to address alleged contract violations.”
Reynolds Sch. Dist. v. Oregon Sch. Employees Ass'n, 650 P.2d 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees, Locals 626 & 2831 v. Lane Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 607 P.2d 1212 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(e) — 1 case
Sch. Dist. 115 v. Oregon Sch. Employees Ass'n, Chapter 66, 669 P.2d 821 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(f) — 1 case
Jefferson Cnty. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 23 P.3d 401 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(2)(g) — 2 cases
Ahern v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 988 P.2d 364 (Or. 1999). “) As the following discussion reveals, we agree with plaintiffs concession. The question is whether plaintiff nonetheless can avoid ERB’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.”
Jefferson Cnty. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 23 P.3d 401 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(3) — 5 cases
Ahern v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 988 P.2d 364 (Or. 1999). “) As the following discussion reveals, we agree with plaintiffs concession. The question is whether plaintiff nonetheless can avoid ERB’s jurisdiction under ORS 243.”
Rogue River Educ. Ass'n/S. Oregon Bargaining Council/OEA/NEA v. Rogue River Sch. Dist. No. 35, 260 P.3d 619 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. State, 246 P.3d 97 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
Jefferson Cnty. v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 23 P.3d 401 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
State Police Officers'ass'n v. State, 246 P.3d 97 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(4) — 7 cases
Oregon City Fed'n of Teachers v. Oregon City Educ. Ass'n, 584 P.2d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “* * *" Unfair labor practices are defined at ORS 243.672. The portions cited by AFSCME make it an unfair labor practice to: "(f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.”
Tracy v. Lane Cnty., 752 P.2d 300 (Or. 1988).
Blackburn v. Oregon Educ. Ass'n, 873 P.2d 485 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).
George-Buckley v. Medford Sch. Dist. 549C, 509 P.3d 738 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(6) — 1 case
Johnson v. Portland Assn. of Teachers, 346 Or. App. 561 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(a) — 2 cases
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 793 P.2d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Harrison v. Cent. Linn Sch. Dist. No. 552-C, 578 P.2d 460 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(c) — 1 case
Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017). “As relevant to this case, a public employer or its desig- nated representative commits an unfair labor practice if the employer or representative “interfere[s] with, restrain[s] or coerce[s] employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(e) — 1 case
Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017). “As relevant to this case, a public employer or its desig- nated representative commits an unfair labor practice if the employer or representative “interfere[s] with, restrain[s] or coerce[s] employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l) — 1 case
AFSCME Council 75 v. Oregon Health Sciences Univ., 755 P.2d 141 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(a) — 16 cases
Am. Fed'n of State Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of Lebanon, 388 P.3d 1028 (Or. 2017). “As relevant to this case, a public employer or its desig- nated representative commits an unfair labor practice if the employer or representative “interfere[s] with, restrain[s] or coerce[s] employees in or because of the exercise of rights guaranteed in ORS 243.”
Wy'East Educ. Ass'n v. Oregon Trail Sch. Dist. No. 46, 260 P.3d 626 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “As relevant here, the association alleged that the district violated the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) — specifically ORS 243.672(l)(a), (b), and (e) (set out below) — by improperly deducting health insurance premiums normally paid by the district from…”
Clackamas Cnty. Employees' Ass'n v. Clackamas Cnty./Clackamas Cnty. Dist. Attorney, 259 P.3d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
Vaandering v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1194 (Or. 2016). “However, for us to resolve the issue that she raises, we would have to decide the relationship between the specific unfair labor practice set out in ORS 243.”
Washington Cnty. Police Officers Ass'n v. Washington Cnty., 900 P.2d 483 (Or. 1995).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(b) — 3 cases
Wy'East Educ. Ass'n v. Oregon Trail Sch. Dist. No. 46, 260 P.3d 626 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “As relevant here, the association alleged that the district violated the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) — specifically ORS 243.672(l)(a), (b), and (e) (set out below) — by improperly deducting health insurance premiums normally paid by the district from…”
Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Local 2503 v. Hood River Cnty., 274 P.3d 186 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 75 v. City of Portland, 366 P.3d 787 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(c) — 7 cases
Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Oregon State Univ., 567 P.2d 1085 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
Vaandering v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1194 (Or. 2016). “However, for us to resolve the issue that she raises, we would have to decide the relationship between the specific unfair labor practice set out in ORS 243.”
Stines v. Oregon State Employes Ass'n, 601 P.2d 799 (Or. 1979).
AFSCME Council 75, Local 3694 v. Josephine Cnty., 228 P.3d 673 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
Towers v. Rosenblum, 310 P.3d 1136 (Or. 2013).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(e) — 52 cases
Ass'n of Oregon Corr. Employees v. State, 295 P.3d 38 (Or. 2013). “The parties also may use ORS 243.672 to address alleged contract violations.”
Springfield Educ. Ass'n v. Springfield Sch. Dist. No. 19, 621 P.2d 547 (Or. 1980).
Portland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 43, IAFF v. City of Portland, 263 P.3d 1040 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “1 ORS 243.672(1) provides, in part: “It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: “(e) Refuse to bargain collectively in good faith with the exclusive representative.”
Beaverton Police Assoc. v. City of Beaverton, 95 P.3d 1160 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).
Wy'East Educ. Ass'n v. Oregon Trail Sch. Dist. No. 46, 260 P.3d 626 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “As relevant here, the association alleged that the district violated the Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) — specifically ORS 243.672(l)(a), (b), and (e) (set out below) — by improperly deducting health insurance premiums normally paid by the district from…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(f) — 5 cases
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “* * *" Unfair labor practices are defined at ORS 243.672. The portions cited by AFSCME make it an unfair labor practice to: "(f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.”
Portland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 43, IAFF v. City of Portland, 263 P.3d 1040 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “1 ORS 243.672(1) provides, in part: “It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: “(e) Refuse to bargain collectively in good faith with the exclusive representative.”
Three Rivers Educ. Ass'n v. Three Rivers Sch. Dist., 294 P.3d 547 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Local 2503 v. Hood River Cnty., 274 P.3d 186 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
AFSCME Local 1246 v. Fairview Training Ctr., 724 P.2d 895 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(g) — 47 cases
Portland State Univ. Chapter of the Am. Ass'n of Univ. Professors v. Portland State Univ., 291 P.3d 658 (Or. 2012). “OPEU, 329 Or 428, 434-35 , 988 P2d 364 (1999) (recognizing that ERB has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether an unfair labor practice has been committed under ORS 243.672). The legislature further has empowered ERB to impose remedies when it finds that an unfair labor…”
Ass'n of Oregon Corr. Employees v. State, 295 P.3d 38 (Or. 2013). “The parties also may use ORS 243.672 to address alleged contract violations.”
Shockey v. City of Portland, 837 P.2d 505 (Or. 1992). “ORS 243.672(1)(g) provides: "(1) It is an unfair labor practice for a public employer or its designated representative to do any of the following: "* * * * * "(g) Violate the provisions of any written contract with respect to employment relations[.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “* * *" Unfair labor practices are defined at ORS 243.672. The portions cited by AFSCME make it an unfair labor practice to: "(f) Refuse or fail to comply with any provision of ORS 243.”
Deschutes Cnty. Sheriff's Ass'n v. Deschutes Cnty., 9 P.3d 742 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(h) — 5 cases
Gresham Grade Teachers Ass'n v. Gresham Grade Sch. Dist. No. 4, 630 P.2d 1304 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
Lane Unified Bargaining Council/SLEA/OEA/NEA v. SOUTH LANE SCH. DIST. 45J3, 9 P.3d 130 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
South Benton Educ. Ass'n v. Monroe Union High Sch. Dist. 1, 732 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
Cascade Bargaining Council v. Jefferson Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 509-J, 732 P.2d 54 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
AFSCME Council 75 v. Oregon Health Sciences Univ., 755 P.2d 141 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.672(l)(i) — 1 case
AFSCME Local 2975 v. City of Corvallis, 752 P.2d 860 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.