Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.762 (2026)
Alternative arbitration procedure under collective bargaining agreement
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
243.762 Alternative arbitration procedure under collective bargaining agreement. Nothing in ORS 240.060, 240.065, 240.080, 240.123, 243.650 to 243.809 and 341.290 is intended to prohibit a public employer and the exclusive representative of its employees from entering into a collective bargaining agreement which provides for a compulsory arbitration procedure which is substantially equivalent to ORS 243.742 to 243.756. [1973 c.536 §22; 2019 c.429 §16]
(Miscellaneous)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1979–1987 · leading case: Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of Medford, 595 P.2d 1268 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).
Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of Medford, 595 P.2d 1268 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). “ORS 243.762 allows public employers and the public employe representative to agree on a substantially equivalent compulsory arbitration procedure instead of the one prescribed by statute.”
South Benton Educ. Ass'n v. Monroe Union High Sch. Dist. 1, 732 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “We conclude that ORS 243.762(1)(h) controls over the more general statutes, ORS 332.”
Willamina Educ. Ass'n v. Willamina Sch. Dist. 30J, 623 P.2d 658 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “722(4) and ORS 243.762. Therefore, we remand this case to ERB for a proper interpretation and application of the law.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.762(1)(h) — 1 case
South Benton Educ. Ass'n v. Monroe Union High Sch. Dist. 1, 732 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “We conclude that ORS 243.762(1)(h) controls over the more general statutes, ORS 332.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.