Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 279A.020 (2026)

Organization of Public Contracting Code

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      279A.020 Organization of Public Contracting Code. (1) Except as otherwise provided in the Public Contracting Code, all public contracting by a contracting agency is subject to this chapter.

      (2) Except as provided in ORS 279C.320, public contracting involving public improvements and other construction services is subject to this chapter and ORS chapter 279C, but not ORS chapter 279B.

      (3) Public contracting involving architects, engineers, photogrammetrists, transportation planners, land surveyors and related services is subject to this chapter and ORS chapter 279C, but not ORS chapter 279B.

      (4) Except as provided in ORS 279C.320, all other public contracting is subject to this chapter and ORS chapter 279B, but not ORS chapter 279C. [2003 c.794 §4; 2005 c.103 §2; 2011 c.458 §9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 567 P.3d 1040 (Or. 2025).
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 567 P.3d 1040 (Or. 2025). “In that case, the petitioners challenged amendments to two rules of the Energy Facility Siting Council (ESFC), OAR 345-050-0010 5 Technically, ORS chapter 279B is not applicable to “contracting involving public improvements,” see ORS 279A.020(2), but no similar provision exists…”
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025). “In that case, the petitioners challenged amendments to two rules of the Energy Facility Siting Council (ESFC), OAR 345-050-0010 5 Technically, ORS chapter 279B is not applicable to “contracting involving public improvements,” see ORS 279A.020(2), but no similar provision exists…”
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025). “In that case, the petitioners challenged amendments to two rules of the Energy Facility Siting Council (EFSC), OAR 345-050-0010 5 Technically, ORS chapter 279B is not applicable to “contracting involving public improvements,” see ORS 279A.020(2), but no similar provision exists…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 279A.020(2): 3 cases
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 567 P.3d 1040 (Or. 2025). “In that case, the petitioners challenged amendments to two rules of the Energy Facility Siting Council (ESFC), OAR 345-050-0010 5 Technically, ORS chapter 279B is not applicable to “contracting involving public improvements,” see ORS 279A.020(2), but no similar provision exists…”
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025). “In that case, the petitioners challenged amendments to two rules of the Energy Facility Siting Council (ESFC), OAR 345-050-0010 5 Technically, ORS chapter 279B is not applicable to “contracting involving public improvements,” see ORS 279A.020(2), but no similar provision exists…”
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025). “In that case, the petitioners challenged amendments to two rules of the Energy Facility Siting Council (EFSC), OAR 345-050-0010 5 Technically, ORS chapter 279B is not applicable to “contracting involving public improvements,” see ORS 279A.020(2), but no similar provision exists…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.