Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 334.100 (2026)

Organization of board; meetings; quorum; compensation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      334.100 Organization of board; meetings; quorum; compensation. (1) Each education service district board shall meet during July and organize by electing one of its members chairperson and one vice chairperson, each of whom shall serve until a successor is elected and qualified. No member shall serve as chairperson for more than two years in succession.

      (2) Regular meetings of an education service district board shall be held on meeting dates determined by the board. Special meetings may be held on dates to be determined by the board.

      (3) Members of the education service district board shall receive no compensation for their services, but shall be reimbursed for all traveling and other expenses necessarily incurred in performing their duties as members of the board.

      (4) A majority of the members of the education service district board shall constitute a quorum. A lesser number may meet and adjourn from time to time and compel the presence of absent members. The affirmative vote of a majority of members of the board is required to transact any business.

      (5) Any duty imposed upon the education service district board as a body must be performed at a regular or special meeting and must be made a matter of record. The consent to any particular measure obtained of individual members when the board is not in session is not an act of the board and is not binding upon the district. [Amended by 1963 c.544 §34; 1965 c.100 §177; 1975 c.477 §8; 1975 c.647 §29c; 1975 c.770 §41a; 1981 c.131 §5]

 

(Pilot Education Service Districts)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1986–1986 · leading case: Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 10 Or. Tax 315 (Or. T.C. 1986).
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 10 Or. Tax 315 (Or. T.C. 1986). “Moreover, under the statutory scheme, even if School District 5-J does not elect four directors from its district boundaries, it has the power to veto any proposal by defendant to provide services to school districts.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 334.100(4): 1 case
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 10 Or. Tax 315 (Or. T.C. 1986). “Moreover, under the statutory scheme, even if School District 5-J does not elect four directors from its district boundaries, it has the power to veto any proposal by defendant to provide services to school districts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.