419B.656
Tribal customary adoption; rules; forms. (1) As used in this section, “tribal customary
adoption” means the adoption of an Indian child, by and through the tribal
custom, traditions or law of the child’s tribe, and which may be effected
without the termination of parental rights.
(2) If the
juvenile court determines that tribal customary adoption is in the best
interests, as described in ORS 419B.612, of a ward who is an Indian child and
the child’s tribe consents to the tribal customary adoption:
(a) The
Department of Human Services shall provide the Indian child’s tribe and
proposed tribal customary adoptive parents with a written report on the Indian
child, including, to the extent not otherwise prohibited by state or federal
law, the medical background, if known, of the child’s parents, and the child’s
educational information, developmental history and medical background,
including all known diagnostic information, current medical reports and any
psychological evaluations.
(b) The court
shall accept a tribal customary adoptive home study conducted by the Indian
child’s tribe if the home study:
(A) Includes
federal criminal background checks, including reports of child abuse, that meet
the standards applicable under the laws of this state for all other proposed
adoptive placements;
(B) Uses the
prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child’s tribe as the
standards for evaluation of the proposed adoptive placement;
(C) Includes an
evaluation of the background, safety and health information of the proposed
adoptive placement, including the biological, psychological and social factors
of the proposed adoptive placement and assessment of the commitment, capability
and suitability of the proposed adoptive placement to meet the Indian child’s
needs; and
(D) Except where
the proposed adoptive placement is the Indian child’s current foster care
placement, is completed prior to the placement of the Indian child in the
proposed adoptive placement.
(c)(A)
Notwithstanding subsection (3) of this section, the court may not accept the
tribe’s order or judgment of tribal customary adoption if any adult living in
the proposed adoptive placement has a felony conviction for child abuse or
neglect, spousal abuse, crimes against a child, including child pornography, or
a crime involving violence.
(B) As used in
this paragraph, “crime involving violence” has the meaning described by the
Department of Human Services by rule, which must include rape, sexual assault
or homicide, but may not include other physical assault or battery.
(3)(a) The
juvenile court shall accept an order or judgment for tribal customary adoption
that is filed by the Indian child’s tribe if:
(A) The court
determines that tribal customary adoption is an appropriate permanent placement
option for the Indian child;
(B) The court
finds that the tribal customary adoption is in the Indian child’s best
interests, as described in ORS 419B.612; and
(C) The order or
judgment:
(i) Includes a
description of the modification of the legal relationship of the Indian child’s
parents or Indian custodian and the child, including contact, if any, between
the child and the parents or Indian custodian, responsibilities of the parents
or Indian custodian and the rights of inheritance of the parents and child;
(ii) Includes a
description of the Indian child’s legal relationship with the tribe; and
(iii) Does not
include any child support obligation from the Indian child’s parents or Indian
custodian.
(b) The court
shall afford full faith and credit to a tribal customary adoption order or
judgment that is accepted under this subsection.
(4)(a)
Notwithstanding ORS 109.276, a tribal customary adoptive parent is not required
to file a petition for adoption when the court accepts a tribal customary
adoption order or judgment under subsection (3) of this section.
(b) The tribal
customary adoptive parent shall file an Adoption Summary and Segregated
Information Statement with accompanying exhibits as provided under ORS 109.287.
(c)
Notwithstanding ORS 21.135, the clerk of the juvenile court may not charge or
collect first appearance fees for a proceeding under this subsection.
(d) After
accepting a tribal customary adoption order or judgment under subsection (3) of
this section, the juvenile court that accepted the order or judgment shall
proceed as provided in ORS 109.350 and enter a judgment of adoption. In
addition to the requirements under ORS 109.350, the judgment of adoption must
include a statement that any parental rights or obligations not specified in
the judgment are transferred to the tribal customary adoptive parents and a
description of any parental rights or duties retained by the Indian child’s
parents, the rights of inheritance of the child and the child’s parents and the
child’s legal relationship with the child’s tribe.
(e) A tribal
customary adoption under this section does not require the consent of the
Indian child or the child’s parents.
(f) Upon the
court’s entry of a judgment of adoption under this section, the court’s
jurisdiction over the Indian child terminates as provided in ORS 419B.328
(2)(d).
(g) Records of
adoptions filed and established under this subsection shall be kept in
accordance with, and are subject to, ORS 109.289.
(5) Any parental
rights or obligations not specifically retained by the Indian child’s parents
in the juvenile court’s adoption judgment are conclusively presumed to transfer
to the tribal customary adoptive parents.
(6) This section
shall remain operative only to the extent that compliance with the provisions
of this section do not conflict with federal law as a condition of receiving
funding under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act.
(7)(a) The
Department of Human Services shall adopt rules requiring that any report
regarding a ward who is an Indian child that the department submits to the
court, including home studies, placement reports or other reports required
under ORS chapters 109, 418, 419A and 419B, must address tribal customary
adoption as a permanency option.
(b) The Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court may make rules necessary for the court processes
to implement the provisions of this section.
(c) The State
Court Administrator may prepare necessary forms for the implementation of this
section. [2021 c.398 §65a]
Notes of Decisions
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
· cites it 72× “This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
· cites it 72× “This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 329 Or. App. 101 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 5× “” Mother argues that “the tribe” did not file the “order or judgment for the tribal customary adoption” as contemplated by ORS 419B.656, because those documents were filed by DHS.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 36× “In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 36× “In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 326 Or. App. 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“” “Active efforts” are efforts that are “affirmative, active, thor- ough, timely and intended to maintain or reunite an Indian child with the Indian child’s family.” ORS 419B.645(1). 1 S’s father and P’s father are not parties to this appeal.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. A. S., 338 Or. App. 183 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“476(5)(c); “(B) Another permanent plan is better suited to meet the health and safety needs of the child or ward, including the need to preserve the child’s or ward’s sibling attachments and relationships; “(C) If the child is an Indian child, the court finds that tribal…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 374 Or. 813 (Or. 2026).
· cites it 3× “Further, in addition to other aspects of that decision, I agree with the Court of Appeals’ rationale that ORS 419B.656 (juve- nile court acceptance of tribal customary adoption) does not authorize a juvenile court to relitigate a tribe’s inter- nal determination that tribal…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. A. S., 338 Or. App. 183 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“476(5)(c); “(B) Another permanent plan is better suited to meet the health and safety needs of the child or ward, including the need to preserve the child’s or ward’s sibling attachments and relationships; “(C) If the child is an Indian child, the court finds that tribal…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 347 Or. App. 358 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 2× “Father’s failure to raise his inherent authority argu- ment below is particularly problematic given the procedural posture of this case, where below father raised his motion to vacate the juvenile court’s order and judgment on rehear- ing of a referee order terminating the…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J. (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“” “Active efforts” are efforts that are “affirmative, active, thor- ough, timely and intended to maintain or reunite an Indian child with the Indian child’s family.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. J. N. (Or. 2023).
“476(5)(c); “(B) Another permanent plan is better suited to meet the health and safety needs of the child or ward, including the need to preserve the child’s or ward’s sibling attachments and relationships; “(C) If the child is an Indian child, the court finds that tribal…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(1) — 7 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 329 Or. App. 101 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“” Mother argues that “the tribe” did not file the “order or judgment for the tribal customary adoption” as contemplated by ORS 419B.656, because those documents were filed by DHS.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 326 Or. App. 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“” “Active efforts” are efforts that are “affirmative, active, thor- ough, timely and intended to maintain or reunite an Indian child with the Indian child’s family.” ORS 419B.645(1). 1 S’s father and P’s father are not parties to this appeal.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(2) — 3 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(2)(a) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(2)(b) — 4 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(2)(b)(A) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(2)(b)(B) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(2)(c) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(3) — 4 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(3)(a) — 5 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 329 Or. App. 101 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“” Mother argues that “the tribe” did not file the “order or judgment for the tribal customary adoption” as contemplated by ORS 419B.656, because those documents were filed by DHS.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(3)(a)(A) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(3)(a)(B) — 3 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 329 Or. App. 101 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“” Mother argues that “the tribe” did not file the “order or judgment for the tribal customary adoption” as contemplated by ORS 419B.656, because those documents were filed by DHS.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(3)(a)(C) — 4 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(3)(b) — 3 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 374 Or. 813 (Or. 2026).
“Further, in addition to other aspects of that decision, I agree with the Court of Appeals’ rationale that ORS 419B.656 (juve- nile court acceptance of tribal customary adoption) does not authorize a juvenile court to relitigate a tribe’s inter- nal determination that tribal…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(4) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(4)(d) — 4 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (Or. 2025).
“This Oregon Indian Child Welfare Act (ORICWA) case requires us to determine whether, before accepting an order or judgment of tribal customary adoption (TCA) from an Indian child’s tribe, a juvenile court must conduct a contested evidentiary hearing under ORS 419B.656 (the TCA…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(4)(e) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(4)(f) — 3 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 347 Or. App. 358 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
“Father’s failure to raise his inherent authority argu- ment below is particularly problematic given the procedural posture of this case, where below father raised his motion to vacate the juvenile court’s order and judgment on rehear- ing of a referee order terminating the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.656(5) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G., 342 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals from the juvenile court’s order accepting the Cowlitz Indian Tribe’s order of a tribal customary adoption of child, ORS 419B.656, and the juvenile court’s judgment of adoption, ORS 419B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.