Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.255 (2026)

Facts to be pleaded

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419C.255 Facts to be pleaded. (1) The petition shall set forth in ordinary and concise language such of the following facts as are known and indicate any which are not known:

      (a) The name, age and residence of the youth.

      (b) The facts which bring the youth within the jurisdiction of the court as provided in ORS 419C.005.

      (c) The name and residence of the youth’s parents or, if the youth has no parents or the names and residences of both parents are unknown, then the name and address of the youth’s guardian, if the youth has a guardian.

      (d) The name and residence of the person having physical custody of the youth.

      (2) A petition alleging jurisdiction under ORS 419C.005 shall set forth in addition the name of any person who was physically injured or who suffered loss of or damage to property as a result of the conduct alleged. [1993 c.33 §198; 2007 c.609 §20]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: State v. V. L., 509 P.3d 142 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
State v. V. L., 509 P.3d 142 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 14× “400(2), concluding that a youth’s age—though required in a petition under ORS 419C.255—is not a fact that the state is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt under ORS 419C.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.255(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. V. L., 509 P.3d 142 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “400(2), concluding that a youth’s age—though required in a petition under ORS 419C.255—is not a fact that the state is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt under ORS 419C.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.255(1)(b) — 1 case
State v. V. L., 509 P.3d 142 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “400(2), concluding that a youth’s age—though required in a petition under ORS 419C.255—is not a fact that the state is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt under ORS 419C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.