Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 653.305

Bureau’s inquiry into employment of minors

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      653.305 Bureau’s inquiry into employment of minors. The Bureau of Labor and Industries may at any time inquire into wages or hours or conditions of labor of minors employed in any occupation in this state and determine suitable hours and conditions of labor for such minors. [Amended by 1967 c.596 §16; 1979 c.886 §3; 1993 c.18 §131; 2013 c.296 §21]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–1994 · leading case: Northwest Advancement v. Bureau of Labor
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Northwest Advancement v. Bureau of Labor (1989) orctapp · cites it 11× “Appellants first argue that the Multnomah court erred in concluding that the NWA sales operation was governed by the statutes and administrative rules relating to the employment of minors, because NWA does not “employ” minors as that term is used in ORS 653.305, 3 the enabling…”
Albertson's, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries (1994) orctapp “” The Commissioner concluded that: “[Albertson’s] was not regulated under the Fair Labor Standards Act with regard to Employment Certificates, Work Permits, and child labor recordkeeping requirements.”
Northwest Advancement, Inc. v. Wage & Hour Commission (1989) orctapp “370(1) provides: “In addition to any other penalty provided by law, [Bureau] may impose upon any person not regulated under [FLSA] who violates ORS 653.305 to 653.370 or any rule adopted by [WHC] thereunder, a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each violation.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 653.305(1) — 1 case
Northwest Advancement v. Bureau of Labor (1989) orctapp “Appellants first argue that the Multnomah court erred in concluding that the NWA sales operation was governed by the statutes and administrative rules relating to the employment of minors, because NWA does not “employ” minors as that term is used in ORS 653.305, 3 the enabling…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.