657.679
Determination that employing unit or employment is subject to this chapter;
notice; application for hearing.
A determination of the Director of the Employment Department or the authorized
representative of the director:
(1) As to whether
an employing unit is an employer subject to this chapter, or
(2) That services
performed by an individual for an employer liable for reimbursement payments in
lieu of taxes is employment subject to this chapter,
shall become final 20
days after written notice of the determination is mailed to the last-known
address of the employing unit of record with the director unless within such
time the employing unit files an application with the director for a hearing
with respect thereto as provided in ORS 657.683. [1963 c.354 §2 (657.552,
657.652, 657.679, 657.681 and 657.683 enacted in lieu of 657.472, 657.512,
657.550 and 657.672); 1975 c.156 §4; 1977 c.538 §11]
657.680 [Repealed by 1959 c.376 §4]
Notes of Decisions
Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Emp. Dep't, 50 P.3d 1193 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “683(4) provides: “All testimony at any hearing held under ORS 657.679 and 657.681 shall be recorded but need not be transcribed unless a petition for judicial review from the decision of the hearing officer is filed in the manner and within the time prescribed.”
Repub. Dev. Co. v. Emp. Div., 587 P.2d 466 (Or. 1978).
“Albeit all of the facts do not point the same way and several of the persons furnishing services to petitioner probably would have been classified as independent contractors had petitioner been charged with being responsible for their tortious conduct, it is our conclusion that…”
Byrne Trucking, Inc. v. Emp. Div., 574 P.2d 664 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
“Petitioner applied for a hearing before an Employment Division referee pursuant to ORS 657.679 and 657.683. The referee held the owner-operators were employes under ORS ch 657 and affirmed the order of assessment.”
West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Emp. Div., 635 P.2d 1033 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 3× “683(4) provides: "All testimony at any hearing held under ORS 657.679 and 657.681 shall be recorded but need not be transcribed unless a petition for judicial review from the decision of the referee is filed in the manner and within the time prescribed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.