697.087
Injunction; damages; attorney fees; limitation on actions. (1) Any person injured as a result
of the violation of any provision of ORS 697.015 or 697.058 or any rule adopted
under ORS 697.031 or 697.085 may bring an action in an appropriate court to
enjoin the practice or to recover actual damages or $200, whichever is greater.
The court or the jury may award punitive damages and the court may provide such
equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper.
(2)
Notwithstanding any other actions provided by law, the Attorney General of the
State of Oregon or the prosecuting attorney of any county may bring an action
in the name of the state against any person to restrain and prevent violation
of any provision of ORS 697.005 to 697.095.
(3) In any action
brought by a person under this section, the court may award, in addition to the
relief provided, reasonable attorney fees at trial and on appeal and costs. If
the defendant prevails, the court may award reasonable attorney fees at trial
and on appeal and costs if it finds the action to be frivolous.
(4) Actions
brought under this section shall be commenced within one year from the date the
violation occurs. [1995 c.622 §7]
697.090 [Repealed by 1959 c.525 §36]
Notes of Decisions
Shelton v. Wilson (In re Wilson), 311 B.R. 566 (D. Or. 2004).
· cites it 3× “ORS 697.087, 697.095. Wilson and Krysl argue that the plain meaning of the statute requires Shelton to comply with the registration requirements under Oregon law.”
Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl), 304 B.R. 425 (D. Or. 2004).
· cites it 4× “Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be granted; further, because they have incurred attorney’s fees and costs in defending against Plaintiffs complaint, Defendants have been “injured” as the term is used in ORS 697.087(1) and thus Defendants are entitled to an…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 697.087(1) — 2 cases
Shelton v. Wilson (In re Wilson), 311 B.R. 566 (D. Or. 2004).
“ORS 697.087, 697.095. Wilson and Krysl argue that the plain meaning of the statute requires Shelton to comply with the registration requirements under Oregon law.”
Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl), 304 B.R. 425 (D. Or. 2004).
“Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be granted; further, because they have incurred attorney’s fees and costs in defending against Plaintiffs complaint, Defendants have been “injured” as the term is used in ORS 697.087(1) and thus Defendants are entitled to an…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 697.087(3) — 1 case
Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl), 304 B.R. 425 (D. Or. 2004).
“Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be granted; further, because they have incurred attorney’s fees and costs in defending against Plaintiffs complaint, Defendants have been “injured” as the term is used in ORS 697.087(1) and thus Defendants are entitled to an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.