Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 809.430 (2026)

Notice of suspension, cancellation or revocation; contents; service; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      809.430 Notice of suspension, cancellation or revocation; contents; service; rules. (1) When the Department of Transportation, as authorized or required, suspends, revokes or cancels driving privileges, commercial driving privileges or the right to apply for driving privileges or commercial driving privileges, the department shall give notice under this section of such action to the person whose driving privileges, commercial driving privileges or right to apply is affected.

      (2) Notice under this section shall state the nature and reason for the action and, in the case of a suspension, whether it was ordered by a court.

      (3) The department shall serve the notice in a manner determined by the department by rule. [1983 c.338 §355; 1989 c.636 §36; 1989 c.801 §1; 1991 c.695 §1; 1993 c.741 §83; 2013 c.237 §21; 2019 c.312 §24]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1986–2015 · leading case: State v. Click, 755 P.2d 693 (Or. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Click, 755 P.2d 693 (Or. 1988). · cites it 6× “180(1) inadvertently omits reference to "ORS 811.”
State v. Orueta, 164 P.3d 267 (Or. 2007). · cites it 2× “310(1) (authorizing cancellation); ORS 809.430 (requiring notice); ORS 809.440 (providing for hearings).”
Dooney v. Dep't of Transp., 751 P.2d 790 (Or. 1988). · cites it 2× “430) provided: "When the division, as authorized or required, suspends, revokes or cancels a license or the right to apply for a license to operate motor vehicles, it shall give notice of such action to the person whose license or right is affected. The notice shall state the…”
State v. DeMello, 716 P.2d 732 (Or. 1986). · cites it 4× “570 (now ORS 809.430) provided: "* * * When the division, as authorized or required, suspends, revokes or cancels a license or the right to apply for a license to operate motor vehicles, it shall give notice of such action to the person whose license or right is affected.”
State v. Bass, 778 P.2d 993 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “See ORS 809.430. That argument lacks merit and requires no discussion.”
State v. Lewis, 935 P.2d 1072 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “500 (1989) (Oregon statute, Or. Rev. Stat. § 809.430 [1995], provides for notice of suspension by ordinary mail in some circumstances but requires certified mail, return receipt requested in other cases); Rogers v.”
State ex rel. Motor Vehs. Div.. v. Norblad, 882 P.2d 598 (Or. 1994). “Notwithstanding ORS 809.430, the department is not required to give any notice of intent to suspend or suspension in addition to that provided under ORS 813.”
State v. Straley, 717 P.2d 638 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “570 1 (now ORS 809.430), that, effective May 7, 1984, her driver’s license and right to apply for a new license would be indefinitely suspended for failure to appear in court.”
State v. Benner, 726 P.2d 1209 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “570 was recodified as ORS 809.430. Or Laws 1983, ch 338, § 978.”
State v. Click, 742 P.2d 67 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “ORS 809.430(3)(a). The envelope had been returned to the MVD marked “unclaimed.”
State v. Phillips, 765 P.2d 230 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Rather, it stated that, if a hearing were requested, the suspension would be withdrawn. According to defendant, the notice could be read to mean that his license already had been suspended and would remain suspended unless and until he requested a hearing.”
State v. Crisafi, 350 P.3d 519 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “To cancel an improperly issued license, ODOT must follow the procedures that the legislature has established to do that, which include giving notice to the affected party, ORS 809.430, and conducting a hearing, ORS 809.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 809.430(3)(a) — 3 cases
State v. Click, 755 P.2d 693 (Or. 1988). “180(1) inadvertently omits reference to "ORS 811.”
State v. Click, 742 P.2d 67 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “ORS 809.430(3)(a). The envelope had been returned to the MVD marked “unclaimed.”
State v. Sickles, 736 P.2d 223 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 809.430(3)(b) — 1 case
State v. Click, 755 P.2d 693 (Or. 1988). “180(1) inadvertently omits reference to "ORS 811.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.