Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

25 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1804 (2026)

 Relief.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1804.  Relief.

(a)  Injunctive.--In the event that a commission fails to adhere to any provision of this part, the secretary is authorized to seek declaratory and injunctive relief in Commonwealth Court.

(b)  Withholding of appropriations.--In accordance with sections 1801 (relating to Attorney General) and 1803 (relating to power of department) and in addition to any remedy provided in subsection (a), the State Treasurer shall, upon notification, withhold any part or all of the State appropriations to which a county is entitled, including funding for the court of common pleas but excluding funding for human services.

 

Cross References.  Section 1804 is referred to in sections 1801, 1803 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: R. Rossman v. DOS of the Com. of PA (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025).
R. Rossman v. DOS of the Com. of PA (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025). “§ 1803(a), (b); see also Section 1804(b) of the Voter Registration Act, 25 Pa.C.S. § 1804(b) (requiring the State Treasurer, upon notice, to withhold “any part or all of the State appropriations to which a county is entitled, including funding for the court of common pleas but…”
25 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1804(b): 1 case
R. Rossman v. DOS of the Com. of PA (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025). “§ 1803(a), (b); see also Section 1804(b) of the Voter Registration Act, 25 Pa.C.S. § 1804(b) (requiring the State Treasurer, upon notice, to withhold “any part or all of the State appropriations to which a county is entitled, including funding for the court of common pleas but…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.