Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 7514. Payments involving one political subdivision.
(a) General rule.--All bills or claims to be paid from any appropriation made by a political subdivision
coterminous with the local organization, after first being approved by the local organization
or an appropriate officer thereof designated for that purpose, shall be paid from
the treasury of the political subdivision only upon the warrant or order of the officer
or officers of the political subdivision designated by law to approve or countersign
warrants or orders for the payment of the ordinary expenses of the political subdivision,
and shall be subject to audit in the same manner as other financial transactions of
the political subdivision. In each case, the officer or officers shall have the same
power to approve or disapprove as they have in case of warrants for ordinary expenses
of the political subdivision, and no warrant or order for the payment thereof shall
be issued without the approval.
(b) Gift or grant of money.--Any gift or grant of money made to the local organization or to the political subdivision
for the payment of expenses incurred or to be incurred by or for the organization
shall be deposited in the treasury of the political subdivision and shall be appropriated
by the political subdivision for the purpose for which the gift or grant was made,
and any bills or claims to be paid from the gift or grant shall be paid in the manner
provided in this subchapter for the payment of other bills and claims against the
political subdivision.
Cross References. Section 7514 is referred to in section 7515 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Pennsylvania Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. P.H. Glatfelter Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 747 (M.D. Penn. 2001).
“Final Judgment on the Merits Both Plaintiffs and Defendant argue that a supersedeas action is “akin to a preliminary injunction,” and both present their positions with reference to case law addressing the preclusive effect of findings made during preliminary injunction…”
Pennsylvania Pub. Int. Res. Grp., Inc. v. Ph Glatfelter Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 747 (M.D. Penn. 2001).
“Final Judgment on the Merits Both Plaintiffs and Defendant argue that a supersedeas action is "akin to a preliminary injunction," and both present their positions with reference to case law addressing the preclusive effect of findings made during preliminary injunction…”
35 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7514(d)(1): 2 cases
Pennsylvania Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. P.H. Glatfelter Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 747 (M.D. Penn. 2001).
“Final Judgment on the Merits Both Plaintiffs and Defendant argue that a supersedeas action is “akin to a preliminary injunction,” and both present their positions with reference to case law addressing the preclusive effect of findings made during preliminary injunction…”
Pennsylvania Pub. Int. Res. Grp., Inc. v. Ph Glatfelter Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 747 (M.D. Penn. 2001).
“Final Judgment on the Merits Both Plaintiffs and Defendant argue that a supersedeas action is "akin to a preliminary injunction," and both present their positions with reference to case law addressing the preclusive effect of findings made during preliminary injunction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.