Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4524 (2026)

 Selection of jurors for service.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 4524.  Selection of jurors for service.

Except as otherwise provided in section 4525 (relating to equipment used for selection of jurors), the jury selection commission shall maintain a master list or jury wheel and shall place therein the names of persons included on the list of qualified jurors. Upon receipt of a court order pursuant to section 4531 (relating to issuance of court orders for jurors), the commission shall publicly select at random from the master list or jury wheel such number of names of persons as may be required to be summoned for assignment to jury arrays. A separate list of names and addresses of persons assigned to each jury array shall be prepared and made available for public inspection at the offices of the commission no later than 30 days prior to the first date on which the array is to serve.

 

Renumbering.  Section 4531, referred to in section 4524, was renumbered from 4541 pursuant to section 216(a)(1) of the act of October 5, 1980, P.L.693, No.142.

Cross References.  Section 4524 is referred to in section 4521 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–2007 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Long, 922 A.2d 892 (Pa. 2007).
Commonwealth v. Long, 922 A.2d 892 (Pa. 2007). “Although the jury array is considered a public judicial record under 42 Pa.C.S. § 4524, it does not follow that the list of impaneled jurors is also considered a public judicial record.”
Gannett Co., Inc. v. State, 571 A.2d 735 (Del. 1990). “22, § 594; 42 Pa.Cons.Stat. Ann. § 4524; Tenn.Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.