§ 1712.1. Contract controversies.
(a) Right to claim.--A contractor may file a claim with the contracting officer in writing for controversies
arising from a contract entered into by the Commonwealth.
(b) Filing of claim.--A claim shall be filed with the contracting officer within six months of the date
it accrues. If a contractor fails to file a claim or files an untimely claim, the
contractor is deemed to have waived its right to assert a claim in any forum. Untimely
filed claims shall be disregarded by the contracting officer.
(c) Contents of claim.--A claim shall state all grounds upon which the contractor asserts a controversy exists.
(d) Determination.--The contracting officer shall review a claim and issue a final determination in writing
regarding the claim within 120 days of the receipt of the claim unless extended by
consent of the contracting officer and the contractor. If the contracting officer
fails to issue a final determination within the 120 days unless extended by consent
of the parties, the claim shall be deemed denied. The determination of the contracting
officer shall be the final order of the purchasing agency.
(e) Statement of claim.--Within 15 days of the mailing date of a final determination denying a claim or within
135 days of filing a claim if no extension is agreed to by the parties, whichever
occurs first, the contractor may file a statement of claim with the board.
(f) Applicability.--The provisions of 2 Pa.C.S. (relating to administrative law and procedure) shall not
apply to this section.
(Dec. 3, 2002, P.L.1147, No.142, eff. imd.)
2002 Amendment. Act 142 added section 1712.1.
Cross References. Section 1712.1 is referred to in sections 1702, 1724 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Dep't of Gen. Servs. v. Pittsburgh Bldg. Co., 920 A.2d 973 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
· cites it 4× “1 of the Procurement Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1, because it filed its Supplemental Claim with DGS three days after filing the Statement of Claim with the Board, and PBC did not file another statement of claim.”
Sci. Games Int'l, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 66 A.3d 740 (Pa. 2013).
· cites it 2× “See 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1. According to the panel, however, the availability of this administrative remedy cannot impede access to the Commonwealth Court’s original jurisdiction to seek nonmonetary relief, since “[t]hat reading .”
Roe v. Pennsylvania Game Comm'n, 147 A.3d 1244 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See 62 Pa.C.S. §1712.1. The question of whether Petitioner has complied with section 1712.”
Clairton Slag, Inc. v. Dep't of Gen. Servs., 2 A.3d 765 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).
· cites it 2× “; 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1. Clairton Slag nonetheless contends that even if filing a claim with the Contracting *781 Officer constitutes an administrative remedy, then it was not required to be “exhausted” as that would have been futile or ineffective.”
Wayne Knorr, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 973 A.2d 1061 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
· cites it 2× “1(b) of the Procurement Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1(b). PennDOT asserts the Board erred in failing to determine Knorr’s claim was time-barred because, according to PennDOT, Knorr knew of its claim on December 29, 2000, but did not submit its claim to PennDOT until July 25, 2003.”
Telwell, Inc. v. Pub. Sch. Employees' Ret. Sys., 88 A.3d 1079 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014).
· cites it 2× “1 [, 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1,] (relating to contract controversies)[ 10 ] and Subchapter C (relating to Board of Claims) but only to the extent set forth in this chapter.”
Dubaskas v. Commonwealth, 81 A.3d 167 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
“§ 5522 (providing, among other things, notice requirements for actions against government units) and 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1 (establishing procedure to be used in pursuing claim arising from contract entered into by Commonwealth).”
John XXIII Home v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 934 A.2d 198 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
· cites it 2× “1147, and reenacted as part of Title 62 of Pennsylvania’s Consolidated Statutes, effective June 28, 2003. Under the current version, an aggrieved contractor must file a claim with the contracting officer of the Commonwealth within six months of the date it accrues.”
62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1712.1(a): 8 cases
62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1712.1(b): 11 cases
Wayne Knorr, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 973 A.2d 1061 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
“1(b) of the Procurement Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1(b). PennDOT asserts the Board erred in failing to determine Knorr’s claim was time-barred because, according to PennDOT, Knorr knew of its claim on December 29, 2000, but did not submit its claim to PennDOT until July 25, 2003.”
John XXIII Home v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 934 A.2d 198 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
“1147, and reenacted as part of Title 62 of Pennsylvania’s Consolidated Statutes, effective June 28, 2003. Under the current version, an aggrieved contractor must file a claim with the contracting officer of the Commonwealth within six months of the date it accrues.”
62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1712.1(c): 1 case
62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1712.1(d): 3 cases
Dep't of Gen. Servs. v. Pittsburgh Bldg. Co., 920 A.2d 973 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
“1 of the Procurement Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1, because it filed its Supplemental Claim with DGS three days after filing the Statement of Claim with the Board, and PBC did not file another statement of claim.”
62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1712.1(e): 7 cases
Dep't of Gen. Servs. v. Pittsburgh Bldg. Co., 920 A.2d 973 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
“1 of the Procurement Code, 62 Pa.C.S. § 1712.1, because it filed its Supplemental Claim with DGS three days after filing the Statement of Claim with the Board, and PBC did not file another statement of claim.”
John XXIII Home v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 934 A.2d 198 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
“1147, and reenacted as part of Title 62 of Pennsylvania’s Consolidated Statutes, effective June 28, 2003. Under the current version, an aggrieved contractor must file a claim with the contracting officer of the Commonwealth within six months of the date it accrues.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.