Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1132 (2026)
Perfection of security interest (Deleted by amendment).
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 1132. Perfection of security interest (Deleted by amendment).
2001 Amendment. Section 1132 was deleted by amendment June 8, 2001, P.L.123, No.18, effective July 1, 2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1983–1994 · leading case: Brace v. United States, Farmers Home Admin. (In Re Brace), 163 B.R. 274 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1994).
Brace v. United States, Farmers Home Admin. (In Re Brace), 163 B.R. 274 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1994). “§ 9302 (Purdon, 1984), directs us to the Motor Vehicle Code for controlling authority. In Pennsylvania, a security interest in a vehicle is not perfected until the Department of Transportation receives an application for a certificate of title with information regarding the…”
First Nat'l Bank of Pennsylvania v. Cech (In Re Ambrose), 148 B.R. 244 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1992). “There is no dispute that First National initially perfected its lien against the vehicles in connection with the transaction between it and KAG Leasing.”
Solis v. Fid. Consum. Disc. Co., 58 B.R. 983 (E.D. Pa. 1986). “75 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1132(b). It is also undisputed that Fidelity actually possessed the original Certificate of Title as of July, 1980.”
Pittsburgh Nat'l Bank v. Schmidt, 41 Pa. D. & C.3d 143 (1985). “Plaintiff’s security interest was likewise performed pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1132(b), by notation thereof on the certificate of title to the vehicle.”
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach v. Hoffer (In Re Hoffer), 34 B.R. 678 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1983). “75 Pa.Cons.Stat. § 1132. The bank’s apparent contention is that since the debtor’s failure to record the security interest was fraudulent, the interest of the bank should be deemed perfected.”
Carbon-Monroe-Pike Mental Health/Mental Retardation Prog. v. Burnley Workshop of the Poconos, Inc. (In re Burnley Workshop of the Poconos, Inc.), 59 B.R. 969 (M.D. Penn. 1985). “The court agrees with appellees that such an interpretation would violate the public policy against the establishment of secret liens embodied in the recording provisions in Pennsylvania statutes.”
In re Lovell, 36 B.R. 777 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1984). “As stated in 75 Pa.Cons.Stat. § 1132(b), perfection of a security interest in a consumer vehicle is generally perfected as follows: (b) Method of perfection.”
— 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1132(b) — 4 cases
First Nat'l Bank of Pennsylvania v. Cech (In Re Ambrose), 148 B.R. 244 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1992). “There is no dispute that First National initially perfected its lien against the vehicles in connection with the transaction between it and KAG Leasing.”
Solis v. Fid. Consum. Disc. Co., 58 B.R. 983 (E.D. Pa. 1986). “75 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1132(b). It is also undisputed that Fidelity actually possessed the original Certificate of Title as of July, 1980.”
Pittsburgh Nat'l Bank v. Schmidt, 41 Pa. D. & C.3d 143 (1985). “Plaintiff’s security interest was likewise performed pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 1132(b), by notation thereof on the certificate of title to the vehicle.”
In re Lovell, 36 B.R. 777 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1984). “As stated in 75 Pa.Cons.Stat. § 1132(b), perfection of a security interest in a consumer vehicle is generally perfected as follows: (b) Method of perfection.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.