Com. v. Wright, 175 A.3d 1049 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).

Go Syfert

Caselaw
Laws
AI Research
Tools
Jury Selection Brief Check Citation Analytics AI MCP Access About this tool
Links
Jacksonville Injury Lawyer Jacksonville Notary FL Digest FL Admin Code FL Scratch-Off Odds

Help

"summary judgment"Exact phrase, words in order negligence AND damagesBoth terms required negligence OR malpracticeEither term negligence NOT comparativeExclude a term (slip OR trip) AND fallGroup with parentheses negligence w/5 damagesWithin 5 words of each other neglig*Prefix wildcard court:fla*Limit to a court judge:smithOpinions by a judge date:2020-2024Filed in a year range name:johnsonSearch the case name only summary:"breach of contract"Search the summary only

Case-insensitive, and stemmed — running also finds run, runs, ran. Mix them freely:
(negligence OR malpractice) w/15 damages court:fla date:2020-2024

Search gives you a list of results. Go is the “I know what I want” button.

Type a statute number (83.49), a rule (Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540, or 16-5-1 for O.C.G.A.), a reporter citation (415 S.E.2d 615, 410 U.S. 113) or a case name (Roe v. Wade), and Go takes you straight there.

More than one case answers to that name? You get a short pick list instead of a guess. A citation that doesn’t resolve gets checked, and Go suggests the closest pages it can find.

If nothing matches, Go falls back to an ordinary search and says so.

83.49 410 U.S. 113 Roe v. Wade

The search box at the top of every page is the Go lane.

Something look wrong on this page?

Garbled text, a bad heading, a section that stops mid-sentence: tell us and it gets fixed. The page address, your screen size and your browser version are sent along automatically so we can reproduce it.

Thank you. Noted.

You’re not signed in.

No bot checks
10,000 AI searches a month
Your own MCP token

Working on

Parsing your query
Checking statute & rule shortcuts
Checking reporter citation index
Searching the case database
Building snippets
Ranking by treatment
Rendering results

Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.

Your account

Signed in as

Plan

Upgrade to Pro, $30/mo Manage billing

MCP TOKEN

Appearance

Name

Firm

States of practice

Bar number

Bar state

Delete my account

Create a free account

Continue with Google Continue with Microsoft

or register with your email

Your name

Firm or organization (optional)

State(s) of practice

Tap every state you practise in.

Bar number (optional)

Bar state (optional)

I have read the privacy policy and the terms.

Leave this empty

Already have an account? Sign in instead.

You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.

Continue with Google Continue with Microsoft

Leave this empty

No account yet? Create a free one.

We sent a six-digit code.

It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.

You’re in.

Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.

Com. v. Wright, 175 A.3d 1049 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). · Go Syfert

Com. v. Wright, 175 A.3d 1049 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

No syfertize treatment data for this case.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

COM.
v.
WRIGHT, T.

3106 EDA 2015.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug 4, 2017.

175 A.3d 1049

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

CP-51-CR-0011742-2008

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed

Case law data sourced from CourtListener (Free Law Project). | Syfert.com