Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37-8.3 (2026)

Second degree child molestation sexual assault

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person is guilty of a second degree child molestation sexual assault if he or she engages in sexual contact with another person fourteen (14) years of age or under.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 93 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: State v. Dubois, 36 A.3d 191 (R.I. 2012).
State v. Dubois, 36 A.3d 191 (R.I. 2012). · cites it 6× “1956 § 11-37-4, and five counts of second-degree child molestation in violation of § 11-37-8.3. The information charged that the offenses occurred between 1992 and 1998.”
State v. Pereira, 973 A.2d 19 (R.I. 2009). · cites it 8× “2 (count 1), one count of second-degree sexual assault against his niece, Kim, in violation of §§ 11-37-4(A), 11-37-5 (count 2), and one count of second-degree child molestation sexual assault against Kim, in violation of §§ 11-37-8.3, 11-37-8.4 (count 3). [1] After a trial,…”
State v. Mohapatra, 880 A.2d 802 (R.I. 2005). · cites it 4× “The defendant, Kailash Mohapatra (defendant), appeals from a Superior Court conviction of one count of second-degree child molestation in violation of G.L.1956 § 11-37-8.3. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on February 3, 2005, pursuant to an order…”
State v. Harris, 844 S.W.2d 601 (Tenn. 1992). · cites it 4× “605 R.I.Gen Laws §§ 11-37-8.3, Second degree child 6-30 years 11-37-8.”
State v. Ricardo Florez, 138 A.3d 789 (R.I. 2016). · cites it 2× “On March 31, 2014, a Providence County Superior Court jury' found the defendant, Ricardo Florez (defendant or Florez), guilty of one count of second-degree child molestation sexual assault (sexual contact with a person fourteen years of age or under) in violation of G.L.1956 §§…”
State v. Hak, 963 A.2d 921 (R.I. 2009). · cites it 3× “1 and two counts of second-degree child molestation in violation of § 11-37-8.3. The trial justice denied the defendant’s motion for a new trial on October 6, 2003.”
State v. Merida, 960 A.2d 228 (R.I. 2008). · cites it 2× “On May 9, 2006, a jury found the defendant, Javier Merida, guilty of the following felonies: one count of second-degree child molestation in violation of G.L.1956 § 11-37-8.3 and two counts of first-degree child molestation in violation of § 11-37-8.”
State v. Jesse S. Perry., 182 A.3d 558 (R.I. 2018). · cites it 3× “1, and one count of second-degree child molestation sexual assault, in violation of G.L. 1956 § 11-37-8.3. The trial justice sentenced the defendant to two life sentences, to run concurrently, on each count of first-degree child molestation sexual assault, and a thirty-year…”
Chapdelaine v. State, 32 A.3d 937 (R.I. 2011). · cites it 2× “I Procedural History In 2003, applicant was charged by criminal information with three counts of second-degree child molestation in violation of G.L.1956 § 11-37-8.3. The applicant pled not guilty, and a jury trial commenced on March 31, 2004.”
In Re Richard A., 946 A.2d 204 (R.I. 2008). · cites it 3× “3 The second petition alleged second-degree child molestation sexual assault on Jennifer, in violation of § 11-37-8.3. 4 That same day, the Family Court issued a no-contact order, restraining respondent from having any contact with Jennifer.”
State v. John Rainey, 175 A.3d 1169 (R.I. 2018). · cites it 2× “2; and (3) between April 1, 1992 and August 30, 1992, sexual contact, to wit, hand to breast, with Anna, a person fourteen years of age or under, in violation of §§ 11-37-8.3 and 11-37-8.4. At the time of defendant’s trial in 2013, Anna was thirty-four years old; she testified…”
State v. Ibrahim, 862 A.2d 787 (R.I. 2004). · cites it 2× “Ibrahim, from a Superior Court judgment of conviction entered on February 7, 2002, after a guilty verdict by a jury on one count of second-degree child molestation sexual assault in violation of G.L. 1956 § 11-37-8.3 and § 11-37-8.4. 1 The defendant had been charged with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.