R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-11-28 (2026)

Rights, privileges, and appurtenances included in grant

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any conveyance of real estate all rights, privileges, and appurtenances belonging or appertaining to the granted estate shall be included in the conveyance, unless a different intention shall clearly appear in the deed, and it shall be unnecessary to enumerate or mention them either generally or specifically.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: 140 Reservoir Avenue Assocs. v. Sepe Investments, LLC, 941 A.2d 805 (R.I. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
140 Reservoir Avenue Assocs. v. Sepe Investments, LLC, 941 A.2d 805 (R.I. 2007). · cites it 4× “” Sepe and Slade’s Ferry cite G.L.1956 § 34-11-28 for the proposition that they are the same party in interest as Joan Kilberg.”
Rhode Island Mobile Sportfishermen, Inc. v. Nope's Island Conservation Ass'n, Inc., 59 A.3d 112 (R.I. 2013). · cites it 3× “8 RIMS further asserted in the amended complaint that, by virtue of G.L.1956 § 34-11-28, 9 the right to cross over lot No.”
Finnegan v. LK Goodwin Co., Inc., 768 A.2d 422 (R.I. 2001). “Moreover, § 34-11-28 states that “[i]n any conveyance of real estate all rights, privileges, and appurtenances belonging or appertaining to the granted estate shall be included in the conveyance, unless a different intention shall dearly appear in the deed, and it shall be…”
Manish v. Potvin, 472 A.2d 1220 (R.I. 1984). “1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 34-11-28, which provides: *1223 “In any conveyance of real estate all rights, privileges and appurtenances belonging or appertaining to the granted estate shall be included in the conveyance, unless a different intention shall clearly appear in the…”
Geller Assocs., Inc. v. Lee's Wharf Realty Co., 606 A.2d 1313 (R.I. 1992). “1956 (1984 Reenactment) § 34-11-28. We are of the opinion that the deed in question and the statute cited above are clear and unambiguous.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.