Rhode Island General Laws
R.I. Gen. Laws § 36-10.1-5 (2026)
Municipal employee pension revocation and reduction
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The superior court shall have jurisdiction to review any decisions, appeals, or other proceedings initiated pursuant to any municipal ordinance providing for the revocation or reduction of the pension of any municipal employee for circumstances constituting dishonorable service as defined by municipal ordinances.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2015–2019 · leading case: Ret. Bd. of the Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Corrente, 111 A.3d 301 (R.I. 2015).
Ret. Bd. of the Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Corrente, 111 A.3d 301 (R.I. 2015). “8 After we issued this order, the General Assembly enacted a new statute, G.L.1956 § 36-10.1-5, effective July 8, 2014, titled “Municipal employee pension revocation and reduction,” which reads as follows: “The superior court shall have jurisdiction to review any decisions,…”
Richard P. Sullivan v. Coventry Mun. Employees' Ret. Plan, 203 A.3d 483 (R.I. 2019). “There, while the matter was pending before this Court, the General Assembly adopted G.L. 1956 § 36-10.1-5, which granted the Superior Court subject-matter jurisdiction to review dishonorable-service-based pension-revocation cases.”
Ret. Bd. of the Employees' Ret. Sys. of the City of Providence v. Frank E. Corrente & Angel Taveras, in his capacity as the Mayor of the City of Providence (intervenor)& the City of Providence (intervenor), No. 12-110, 12-111, 12-112 (R.I. Mar. 17, 2015). “-5- enacted a new statute, G.L. 1956 § 36-10.1-5, effective July 8, 2014, titled “Municipal employee pension revocation and reduction,” which reads as follows: “The superior court shall have jurisdiction to review any decisions, appeals or other proceedings initiated pursuant to…”
Ret. Bd. of the Employees' Ret. Sys. of the City of Providence v. Frank E. Corrente & Mayor of the City of Providence, 174 A.3d 1221 (R.I. 2017). “However, we concluded that the newly-enacted statute, G.L. 1956 § 36-10.1-5, vested the Superior Court with jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.