R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 36-14-15 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any action by the commission made pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to review pursuant to chapter 35 of title 42.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1986–2002 · leading case: Carmody v. Rhode Island Conflict of Interest Comm'n, 509 A.2d 453 (R.I. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Carmody v. Rhode Island Conflict of Interest Comm'n, 509 A.2d 453 (R.I. 1986). · cites it 10× “Under § 36-14-15, all state or municipal elected or appointed officials must file an annual financial statement with the commission.”
Pellegrino v. Rhode Island Ethics Comm'n, 788 A.2d 1119 (R.I. 2002). · cites it 2× “See § 36-14-15 (providing that "[a]ny action by the commission made pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to review pursuant to chapter 35 of title 42 [the Administrative Procedures Act]").”
In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 732 A.2d 55 (R.I. 1999). “See also § 36-14-9(a)(15)(b) (Administrative Procedures Act applicable to the ethics commission); § 36-14-15 (any action by ethics commission shall be subject to judicial review); G.”
Rhode Island Higher Educ. Assistance Auth. v. Rhode Island Conflict of Interest Comm'n, 505 A.2d 427 (R.I. 1986). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs also contend that unlike § 36-14-15, § 16-57-7(g) implicitly does not require RIHEAA members to file financial-disclosure statements.”
In Re Advisory From the Governor, 633 A.2d 664 (R.I. 1993). “Second, § 36-14-15 provides that any judicial review of any action by the commission shall be subject to the Administrative Procedures Act.”
DiLuglio v. Rhode Island Ethics Comm'n, 701 A.2d 812 (R.I. 1997). “General Laws 1956 § 36-14-15 provides that “[a]ny action by the commission made pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to review pursuant to chapter 35 of title 42 [the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.