R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5 (2026)

False claims procedure

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a trial or hearing conducted under § 9-1.1-4, may be served at any place in the state.

(b) A civil action under § 9-1.1-4 may not be brought:

(1) More than 6 years after the date on which the violation of § 9-1.1-3 is committed, or

(2) More than three (3) years after the date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been known by the official of the state charged with responsibility to act in the circumstances, but in no event more than ten (10) years after the date on which the violation is committed, whichever occurs last.

(c) If the state elects to intervene and proceed with an action brought under § 9-1.1-4, the state may file its own complaint or amend the complaint of a person who has brought an action under § 9-1.1-4 to clarify or add detail to the claims in which the state is intervening and to add any additional claims with respect to which the state contends it is entitled to relief. For statute of limitations purposes, any state pleading shall relate back to the filing date of the complaint of the person who originally brought the action, to the extent that the claim of the state arises out of the conduct, transactions, or occurrences set forth, or attempted to be set forth, in the prior complaint of that person.

(d) In any action brought under § 9-1.1-4, the state shall be required to prove all essential elements of the cause of action, including damages, by a preponderance of the evidence.

(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a final judgment rendered in favor of the state in any criminal proceeding charging fraud or false statements, whether upon a verdict after trial or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, shall estop the defendant from denying the essential elements of the offense in any action that involves the same transaction as in the criminal proceeding and is brought under § 9-1.1-4(a) or 9-1.1-4(b).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2017 · leading case: United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc., 246 F. Supp. 3d 772 (S.D.N.Y. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc., 246 F. Supp. 3d 772 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “6 (B)(1); R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5(b)(1); Tenn. Code Ann.”
United States ex rel. Dickson v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 123 F. Supp. 3d 584 (D.N.J. 2015). “6(B)(1)); and Rhode Island (R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5(b)). 21 Neither party has argued that any of these statutes should be read differently than the federal statute; accordingly, as with the federal claims, to the extent that Relator alleges that Defendants’ conduct resulted in…”
R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5(b): 1 case
United States ex rel. Dickson v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 123 F. Supp. 3d 584 (D.N.J. 2015). “6(B)(1)); and Rhode Island (R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5(b)). 21 Neither party has argued that any of these statutes should be read differently than the federal statute; accordingly, as with the federal claims, to the extent that Relator alleges that Defendants’ conduct resulted in…”
R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5(b)(1): 1 case
United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc., 246 F. Supp. 3d 772 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “6 (B)(1); R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1.1-5(b)(1); Tenn. Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.