Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-20-2 (2026)

Assessment of damages on default or submission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In all cases, except where otherwise provided, if judgment is rendered on default, discontinuance, submission, or motion, damages shall be assessed by the court, with the intervention of a jury unless cause is shown why there should be no intervention of a jury. The claimant in any case may waive the intervention of a jury.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1960–2001 · leading case: Calise v. Hidden Valley Condo. Ass'n, 773 A.2d 834 (R.I. 2001).
Calise v. Hidden Valley Condo. Ass'n, 773 A.2d 834 (R.I. 2001). · cites it 12× “1956 § 9-20-2 to determine the amount of the plaintiff's damages, [1] committed no error in precluding two defaulted defendants from attempting to question *836 and litigate their liability to the plaintiffs by seeking to introduce evidence of probable comparative negligence on…”
Blazar v. Perkins, 463 A.2d 203 (R.I. 1983). · cites it 13× “1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 9-20-2. The plaintiffs moved that the issue of damages be tried before the trial justice without a jury.”
Bashforth v. Zampini, 576 A.2d 1197 (R.I. 1990). · cites it 3× “1956 (1985 Reenactment) § 9-20-2 provides: “Assessment of damages on default or submission.”
Marks v. D.A. Davis Constr. Corp., 536 A.2d 883 (R.I. 1988). · cites it 6× “1956 (1985 Reenactment) § 9-20-2 4 is a procedural statute that must be applied to the present case.”
Sherman v. McDermott, 329 A.2d 195 (R.I. 1974). “The plaintiff then moved for assessment of damages pursuant to §9-20-2, and the case was heard before a Superior Court justice sitting without a jury.”
Carlson v. Plouffe, 593 A.2d 74 (R.I. 1991). · cites it 5× “1956 (1985 Reenactment) § 9-20-2, provides that “[i]n all cases, except where otherwise provided, if judgment be rendered on default * * * damages shall be assessed by the court, with the intervention of a jury unless cause be shown why there should be no intervention of a jury.”
Pettis v. Henderson, 162 A.2d 540 (R.I. 1960). “1956, §9-20-2, and provides that “if judgment be rendered on default, * * * damages shall be assessed by the court, with the intervention of a jury unless cause be shown why there should be no intervention of a jury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.