Any public official having charge or custody of or control over any public records of convictions of traffic violations or any other state, county or municipal public offenses shall make available to any citizen, upon request, during regular office hours, a copy or copies of any such record requested by such citizen, upon the payment of a reasonable charge or fee therefor. Such official is authorized to fix a charge or fee per copy that would reasonably defray the cost of producing and delivering such copy or copies.
Acts 1974, ch. 581, § 1; T.C.A., § 15-308.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases, 1999–2004 · leading case:
Waller v. Bryan, 16 S.W.3d 770 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
Waller v. Bryan, 16 S.W.3d 770 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 10-7-507 provides: Records of convictions of traffic and other violations — Availability.”
Shabazz v. Campbell, 63 S.W.3d 776 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “The holdings of the Chancellor are clearly correct and as to those documents which are indeed public records as found by the trial judge, Appellant is entitled to a copy of same when he pays for such copying in conformance with Tennessee Code Annotated Section 10-7-507.…”
State of Tennessee v. Wanda Hinson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002).
· cites it 5× “In those contexts, this Court found that the defendant was not prejudiced by the state’s omission because the arrest records of potential trial witnesses and all conviction records are available upon request per statute.”
Cammuse v. Davidson Co. Dist. Atty (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 4× “Any public official having charge or custody of or control over any public records of convictions of traffic violations or any other state, county or municipal public offenses shall make available to any citizen, upon request, during regular office hours, a copy or copies of any…”
State of Tennessee v. William Parker, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 10-7-507 . As his driving record was always available to him, the Defendant was not prejudiced by the State’s failure to provide it to him during discovery.”
Omawali Ashanti Shabazz, a/k/a Fred Dean v. Donal Campbell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “-8- The holdings of the Chancellor are clearly correct and as to those documents which are indeed public records as found by the trial judge, Appellant is entitled to a copy of same when he pays for such copying in conformance with Tennessee Code Annotated Section 10-7-507.…”
State v. Guy William Rush (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
“§ 10-7-507 (1992). Moreover, even if the State should have discovered Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.