Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-11-103 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

Acts 1972, ch. 608, § 3; T.C.A., § 13-1903; Acts 1985, ch. 264, § 1; 1988, ch. 627, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 186 Cal. App. 3d 897 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986).
Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 186 Cal. App. 3d 897 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “§ 35-1700-11 [refers to "a federally assisted governmental program"]; Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-11-103 , subd. 5; Utah Code Ann.”
State ex rel. Comm'r, Dep't of Transp. v. Teasley, 913 S.W.2d 175 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “) In the same chapter, the definition section, T.C.A. § 13-11-103, as pertinent, provides: Definitions.”
State Ex Rel. Com'r v. Teasley, 913 S.W.2d 175 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “) In the same chapter, the definition section, T.C.A. § 13-11-103, as pertinent, provides: Definitions.”
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Matthew Lacy (Tenn. 2026). · cites it 2× “The State therefore met its burden of establishing statutory territorial jurisdiction under section 13-11-103(b). B. Finally, we turn to Lacy’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-11-103(b) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Matthew Lacy (Tenn. 2026). “The State therefore met its burden of establishing statutory territorial jurisdiction under section 13-11-103(b). B. Finally, we turn to Lacy’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.