Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-105 (2026)

Amendments of zoning ordinance provisions - Procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 577,s 1, eff. 3/8/2016.

Acts 1935, ch. 33, § 5; C. Supp. 1950, § 10268.5; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 7, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 13-405; Acts 1989, ch. 34, § 1; 1993, ch. 244, §§ 1, 2; 1993, ch. 262, §§ 2, 3; 1996, ch. 715, § 1; 1997, ch. 69, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1990–2019 · leading case: Edwards v. Allen, 216 S.W.3d 278 (Tenn. 2007).
Edwards v. Allen, 216 S.W.3d 278 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 11× “The Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the 1992 reclassification violated the Rutherford County Zoning Resolution and that the 1992 notice of hearing violated the requirements of Tennessee Code Annotated section 13-7-105. The Defendants filed motions to dismiss…”
Westland West Cmty. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty., 948 S.W.2d 281 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 10× “Tennessee Code Annotated § 13-7-105 mandates submission of the new classification without further inquiry.”
Lewis v. Cleveland Mun. Airport Auth., 289 S.W.3d 808 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 8× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-105(a) (1999) provides as follows: The county legislative body may, from time to time, amend the number, shape, boundary, area or any regulation of or within any district or districts or any other provision of any zoning ordinance; but any such amendment…”
Hutcherson v. Criner, 11 S.W.3d 126 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “With regard to the 1991 Amendment and the 1992 Amendment, T.C.A. § 13-7-105 (Supp.1990) and (1992) provided in pertinent part: 13-7-105.”
State Ex Rel. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Tennessee, Inc. v. Bd. of Commissioners, 806 S.W.2d 181 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “The power of a county legislative body to amend its zoning resolution is set out in T.C.A. § 13-7-105, which reads in part as follows: 13-7-105.”
Fam. Golf of Nashville, Inc. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 964 S.W.2d 254 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 13-7-105(a), 13-7-203(b), 13-7-204.”
Shelton v. Rutherford Cnty., Tenn., 780 F. Supp. 2d 653 (M.D. Tenn. 2011). · cites it 10× “5 As a result, the Tennessee Court of Appeals also necessarily found that Plaintiffs’ petition — however denominated — was subject to Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-105, which specifically provides that any amendment to any provision of a zoning ordinance in Tennessee requires a…”
Steven A. Edwards v. Nancy Allen (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 11× “utes “illegal spot zoning” because it was clearly arbitrary and capricious, having no relation to the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rutherford County and because it arbitrarily favored individual landowners to the detriment of the surrounding landowners,…”
Depot Prop., LLC & Terry Cox v. Town of Arlington, Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “See T.C.A. §§13-7-105(a), 13-7-203(b), 13-7-204.”
Jack R. Owen Revocable Trust v. City of Germantown Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. §§ 13-7-105(a), 13-7-203(b), 13-7-204.”
Wiley Hutcherson v. Rozell Carter (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “With regard to the 1991 Amendment and the 1992 Amendment, T.C.A. § 13-7-105 (Supp. 1990) and (1992) provided in pertinent part: 13-7-105.”
CK Dev., LLC v. Town of Nolensville (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “The court held that “the request to allow a for-profit shooting range on property zoned as Residential 20 for single family dwellings ‘substantially affects’ the use of the land” and, therefore, the procedural requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-105 applied. 216 S.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-105(a): 8 cases
Westland West Cmty. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty., 948 S.W.2d 281 (Tenn. 1997). “Tennessee Code Annotated § 13-7-105 mandates submission of the new classification without further inquiry.”
Edwards v. Allen, 216 S.W.3d 278 (Tenn. 2007). “The Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the 1992 reclassification violated the Rutherford County Zoning Resolution and that the 1992 notice of hearing violated the requirements of Tennessee Code Annotated section 13-7-105. The Defendants filed motions to dismiss…”
Lewis v. Cleveland Mun. Airport Auth., 289 S.W.3d 808 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-105(a) (1999) provides as follows: The county legislative body may, from time to time, amend the number, shape, boundary, area or any regulation of or within any district or districts or any other provision of any zoning ordinance; but any such amendment…”
Fam. Golf of Nashville, Inc. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 964 S.W.2d 254 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 13-7-105(a), 13-7-203(b), 13-7-204.”
Shelton v. Rutherford Cnty., Tenn., 780 F. Supp. 2d 653 (M.D. Tenn. 2011). “5 As a result, the Tennessee Court of Appeals also necessarily found that Plaintiffs’ petition — however denominated — was subject to Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-105, which specifically provides that any amendment to any provision of a zoning ordinance in Tennessee requires a…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-105(b)(1): 1 case
Lewis v. Cleveland Mun. Airport Auth., 289 S.W.3d 808 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-105(a) (1999) provides as follows: The county legislative body may, from time to time, amend the number, shape, boundary, area or any regulation of or within any district or districts or any other provision of any zoning ordinance; but any such amendment…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.