Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206 (2026)

Jurisdiction of board - Parties to appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1935, ch. 44, § 5; C. Supp. 1950, § 3407.5; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 13-706.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Whittemore v. Brentwood Plan. Comm'n, 835 S.W.2d 11 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
Whittemore v. Brentwood Plan. Comm'n, 835 S.W.2d 11 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 20× “State law permits, but does not require, city commissions to empower boards of zoning appeals to perform six functions: (1) making special exceptions [ Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 13-7-206 (a), -207(2)]; (2) interpreting zoning maps [ Tenn.”
City of Brentwood v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 149 S.W.3d 49 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 9× “§ 27-9-101 (2000), the statute defining who may file these petitions, 5 is, in fact, the same as the scope of Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-206(b). It empowers “[a]ny-one who may be aggrieved by any final order or judgment of any board or commission functioning under the laws of this…”
Frank Reed v. Town of Louisville, Tennessee (2024). · cites it 3× “]” The court additionally stated that “the Board of Zoning Appeals acted within the scope of its authority and discretion granted by Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206 , Tenn. Code Ann.”
The Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee v. The Bd. of Zoning Appeals Of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee, 477 S.W.3d 750 (Tenn. 2015). · cites it 4× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 13-7-206(b) permits appeals to the BZA “by any person aggrieved or by any officer, department, board or burean of the municipality affected by any grant or refusal of a building permit ....” Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7206(b) (2011) (emphasis added);…”
Demonbreun v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 206 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “§§ 13-7-206(a), -207(2). 2 The zoning *47 law for Nashville and Davidson County provides the following with respect to the BZA’s issuance of such permits: A.”
Father Ryan High Sch., Inc. v. City of Oak Hill Ex Rel. Oak Hill Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 774 S.W.2d 184 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “T.C.A., §§ 13-7-206, 13-7-207, set forth the jurisdiction and powers of a board of zoning appeals: § 13-T-206 — (a) The zoning ordinance may provide that the board of appeals may, in appropriate cases and subject to the principles, standards, rules, conditions and safeguards set…”
Anita J. Cash, City of Knoxville Zoning Coordinator v. Ed Wheeler, 356 S.W.3d 913 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 13-7-205(b) provides that the chief legislative body “may provide and specify, in its zoning or other ordinance, general rules to govern tiie organization and procedure and jurisdiction of the board of appeals”.”
Odell Binkley v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 14× “” Metro contends that Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206 (a) authorizes Metro to limit the BZA’s jurisdiction.”
City of Brentwood v.Metro Zoning Appeals (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 12× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206 (b) (1999) permits appeals “by any person aggrieved or by any officer, department, board or bureau of the municipality affected by any grant or refusal of a building permit.”
150 4th Ave. N. Tenant, LLC D/B/A WeWork v. The Metro. Nashville Bd. of Zoning Appeals (2020). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206 (b) provides that “[a]ppeals to the board of [zoning] appeals may be taken by any person aggrieved .”
Rebecca Prince v. A&W Constr. & Prop. Mgmt., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206 (b), -207(1) (2019).”
Bee Deselm v. Tennessee Peace Officers Standards & Training Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “The Plaintiffs, by filing a complaint within the Commission, were in effect deemed to have created standing with regard to the process, but not the ultimate outcome.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206(a): 3 cases
Whittemore v. Brentwood Plan. Comm'n, 835 S.W.2d 11 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). “State law permits, but does not require, city commissions to empower boards of zoning appeals to perform six functions: (1) making special exceptions [ Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 13-7-206 (a), -207(2)]; (2) interpreting zoning maps [ Tenn.”
Demonbreun v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 206 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “§§ 13-7-206(a), -207(2). 2 The zoning *47 law for Nashville and Davidson County provides the following with respect to the BZA’s issuance of such permits: A.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206(a)(1999): 1 case
Demonbreun v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 206 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “§§ 13-7-206(a), -207(2). 2 The zoning *47 law for Nashville and Davidson County provides the following with respect to the BZA’s issuance of such permits: A.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-206(b): 3 cases
City of Brentwood v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 149 S.W.3d 49 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “§ 27-9-101 (2000), the statute defining who may file these petitions, 5 is, in fact, the same as the scope of Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7-206(b). It empowers “[a]ny-one who may be aggrieved by any final order or judgment of any board or commission functioning under the laws of this…”
The Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee v. The Bd. of Zoning Appeals Of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee, 477 S.W.3d 750 (Tenn. 2015). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 13-7-206(b) permits appeals to the BZA “by any person aggrieved or by any officer, department, board or burean of the municipality affected by any grant or refusal of a building permit ....” Tenn.Code Ann. § 13-7206(b) (2011) (emphasis added);…”
Whittemore v. Brentwood Plan. Comm'n, 835 S.W.2d 11 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). “State law permits, but does not require, city commissions to empower boards of zoning appeals to perform six functions: (1) making special exceptions [ Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 13-7-206 (a), -207(2)]; (2) interpreting zoning maps [ Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.