Tenn. Code Ann. » Tenn. Code / Title 29 / Chapter 16 / Part 1
Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-16-102 (2026)

Incorporation of chapter into other laws

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Code 1932, § 3133; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-1402.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases, 1997–2006 · leading case: Mills v. Solomon, 43 S.W.3d 503 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mills v. Solomon, 43 S.W.3d 503 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-16-101 (1980). Moreover, chapter 16 states that its provisions shall be deemed, unless expressly stated to the contrary, and without incorporation or reference, to be a part of every section, or legislative act, present or future, which grants the power of…”
James C. Hise, Jr. & wife, Brenda L. Hise, State of Tennessee, Dep't of Transportationm Bruce Saltsman, Comm'r, 968 S.W.2d 852 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “” They contend that the legislature has authorized a suit such as theirs against the state by the passage of § 29-16-102(a) of the eminent domain statute, which provides: This chapter shall be deemed, unless expressly stated to the contrary, and without incorporation or…”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Rufus Reese (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Ronald R. Dunn (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Robert G. Ingrum (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Rebecca Warren (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Nikki Wallace (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Michael Rippy (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. James R. Stephenson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. James Lassiter (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Fred Thomas McKee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Fred P. Walter (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “13 The added provisions that remain in effect are Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-16-102 to -103, -113(b), -114(b)-(d), -118(b)-(c), -123(b), and -125 to -127 as well as everything after the first sentence in Tenn.”
Show all 28 citing cases →
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-16-102(a): 1 case
James C. Hise, Jr. & wife, Brenda L. Hise, State of Tennessee, Dep't of Transportationm Bruce Saltsman, Comm'r, 968 S.W.2d 852 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “” They contend that the legislature has authorized a suit such as theirs against the state by the passage of § 29-16-102(a) of the eminent domain statute, which provides: This chapter shall be deemed, unless expressly stated to the contrary, and without incorporation or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.