Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When used in this chapter, the following words, shall have the meanings set forth below, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

Acts 2011 , ch. 510, § 10.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Donriel A. Borne v. Celadon Trucking Servs., Inc., 532 S.W.3d 274 (Tenn. 2017).
Donriel A. Borne v. Celadon Trucking Servs., Inc., 532 S.W.3d 274 (Tenn. 2017). · cites it 4× “510 (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-39-101 to -104 (2012 & Supp.”
Aundrey Meals Ex Rel. William Meals v. Ford Motor Co., 417 S.W.3d 414 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “Effective October 1, 2011, the Tennessee Civil Justice Act of 2011, Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-39-101 to -104 (2012), limits recovery of non-economic damages in a civil suit where the injury or loss is catastrophic in nature — including a spinal cord injury resulting in…”
Spencer v. Caracal Int'l, LLC (M.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 4× “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101 (defining noneconomic damages) with Tenn.”
Perry (E.D. Tenn. 2025). · cites it 4× “322]; (4) Plaintiff’s “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Regarding Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101 et, seq.” [Doc.”
Morales v. United States, 72 F. Supp. 3d 826 (W.D. Tenn. 2014). · cites it 4× “” See Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-39-101. . Dep. of Dr.”
Nolen v. C R Bard Inc. (M.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101 . If one limits those terms to their use in ordinary speech, however, it seems clear that authorization to market a product pursuant to the § 510(k) process is, in fact, a form of “approval.”
Heath v. C R Bard Inc. (M.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101 . If one limits those terms to their use in ordinary speech, however, it seems clear that authorization to market a product pursuant to the § 510(k) process is, in fact, a form of “approval.”
Nasatir v. Mathes (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “Therefore, while Mark may not be entitled to the noneconomic damages set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101 (2) as argued by Ms.”
Jodi McClay v. Airport Mgmt. Servs., LLC - Dissenting (2020). “Noneconomic damages include compensation for physical and emotional pain; suffering; inconvenience; disfigurement; mental anguish; emotional distress; loss of enjoyment of normal activities, benefits, and pleasures of life; and loss of physical health, 1 Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-39-101(2) — 1 case
Morales v. United States, 72 F. Supp. 3d 826 (W.D. Tenn. 2014). “” See Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-39-101. . Dep. of Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.