Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-301 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
This part is known and may be cited as the "Uniform Arbitration Act."
Repealed and reenacted by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 319, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.
Acts 1983, ch. 462, §§ 17, 23.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Rosenberg v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., 219 S.W.3d 892 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Rosenberg v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., 219 S.W.3d 892 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “[I]f the party that gave notice of dissatisfaction remains dissatisfied, then the party shall so notify the other party and the matter shall be promptly submitted to inexpensive and binding arbitration in accordance with the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act at Tennessee Code…”
T.R. Mills Contractors, Inc. v. WRH Enter., LLC, 93 S.W.3d 861 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “The Uniform Arbitration Act (“UAA”) as adopted in Tennessee and codified at sections 29-5-301 to -320 of the Tennessee Code, however, creates limited exceptions to this rule.”
Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Batts, 59 S.W.3d 142 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Scodro, Arbitrating Novel Legal Questions: A Recommendation for Reform, 105 Yale L.”
Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. v. William Hamilton Smythe, III, 401 S.W.3d 595 (Tenn. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301 to -320 (2012).”
Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet, 63 S.W.3d 351 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Initially, we note that the KareMor opinion was discussing the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act, T.C.A. § 29-5-301, and not the FAA, so matters relating to preemption were not at issue.”
D & E Constr. Co. v. Robert J. Denley Co., 38 S.W.3d 513 (Tenn. 2001). “7 *518 Standard of Review Tennessee has adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act, see Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301 to -320 (2000), which governs “the scope of judicial review of arbitration awards.”
Team Design v. Gottlieb, 104 S.W.3d 512 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301, -320 (2000). 6 .”
Frizzell Constr. Co. v. Gatlinburg, L.L.C., 9 S.W.3d 79 (Tenn. 1999). “1991), the Court of Appeals held that the issue of fraudulent inducement could not be submitted to arbitration under the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301 to-320 (Supp.1990).”
Pugh's Lawn Landscape Co. v. Jaycon Dev. Corp., 320 S.W.3d 252 (Tenn. 2010). “2 Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301 to -320 (2000).”
Arnold v. Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc., 914 S.W.2d 445 (Tenn. 1996). “Tennessee has adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301 through 320 (Supp.”
Glassman, Edwards, Wyatt, Tuttle & Cox, P.C. v. B. J. Wade, 404 S.W.3d 464 (Tenn. 2013). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 29-5-301 to-320 (2012).”
City of Blaine v. John Coleman Hayes & Assocs., Inc., 818 S.W.2d 33 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “The Uniform Arbitration Act was passed by our Legislature in 1983 and is now codified as T.C.A. § 29-5-301 — § 29-5-320 (Supp.1990).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.