Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-318 (2026)
Witnesses - Subpoenas - Depositions - Discovery
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) An arbitrator may issue a subpoena for the attendance of a witness, and for the production of records and other evidence at a hearing, and may administer oaths. A subpoena must be served in the manner for service of subpoenas in a civil action and, upon a motion to the court by a party to the arbitration proceeding or the arbitrator, enforced in the manner for enforcement of subpoenas in a civil action.
- (b) In order to make the proceedings fair, expeditious, and cost effective, upon request of a party to, or a witness in, an arbitration proceeding, an arbitrator may permit a deposition of a witness to be taken for use as evidence at the hearing, including a witness who cannot be subpoenaed for, or is unable to attend, a hearing. The arbitrator shall determine the conditions under which the deposition is taken.
- (c) An arbitrator may permit discovery as the arbitrator decides is appropriate in the circumstances, taking into account the needs of the parties to the arbitration proceeding and other affected persons and the desirability of making the proceeding fair, expeditious, and cost effective.
- (d) If an arbitrator permits discovery under subsection (c), then the arbitrator may order a party to the arbitration proceeding to comply with the arbitrator's discovery-related orders, issue subpoenas for the attendance of a witness and for the production of records and other evidence at a discovery proceeding, and take action against a noncomplying party to the extent a court could if the controversy were the subject of a civil action in this state.
- (e) An arbitrator may issue a protective order to prevent the disclosure of privileged information, confidential information, trade secrets, and other information protected from disclosure to the extent a court could if the controversy were the subject of a civil action in this state.
- (f) All laws compelling a person under subpoena to testify, and all fees for attending a judicial proceeding, a deposition, or a discovery proceeding as a witness, apply to an arbitration proceeding as if the controversy were the subject of a civil action in this state.
- (g) The court may enforce a subpoena or discovery-related order for the attendance of a witness within this state and for the production of records and other evidence issued by an arbitrator in connection with an arbitration proceeding in another state upon conditions determined by the court so as to make the arbitration proceeding fair, expeditious, and cost effective. A subpoena or discovery-related order issued by an arbitrator in another state must be served in the manner provided by law for service of subpoenas in a civil action in this state and, upon a motion to the court by a party to the arbitration proceeding or the arbitrator, enforced in the manner provided by law for enforcement of subpoenas in a civil action in this state.
Added by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 319, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: Glassman, Edwards, Wyatt, Tuttle & Cox, P.C. v. B. J. Wade, 404 S.W.3d 464 (Tenn. 2013).
Glassman, Edwards, Wyatt, Tuttle & Cox, P.C. v. B. J. Wade, 404 S.W.3d 464 (Tenn. 2013). “Otherwise and subject to § 29-5-318, the application may be made in any court of competent jurisdiction.”
City of Blaine v. John Coleman Hayes & Assocs., Inc., 818 S.W.2d 33 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “Otherwise and subject to § 29-5-318, the application may be made in any court of competent jurisdiction.”
Fid. Brokerage Servs. LLC v. Est. of Nancy Bolton (Ky. Ct. App. 2026). “3d at 487–88 (quoting Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-5-318 (West)). Citing Ally Cat, we found no error in the Trial Court’s analysis that the Frankfort Med.”
Allison J. Person, as Administratix of the Est. of Effie J. Wooten v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Primacy Healthcare & Rehab. Ctr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Otherwise and subject to § 29-5-318, the application may be made in any court of competent jurisdiction.”
The SJR Ltd. P'ship v. Christie's Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “Otherwise and subject to § 29-5-318, the application may be made in any court of competent jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.