Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-3-111 (2026)

Specifically devised or bequeathed property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2004, ch. 866, § 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2007 · leading case: In Re Est. of Greenamyre, 219 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Est. of Greenamyre, 219 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 18× “[5] This intent is evident from adoption of relevant parts of the Uniform Probate Code, which favor the "intention of the testator" rule instead of the harsh "in specie" rule when a devise or bequest is sold by a conservator for an incapacitated person who cannot approve or…”
Stewart v. Sewell, 215 S.W.3d 815 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 14× “We granted this appeal to clarify the applicability of the rule of ademption by extinction and of Tennessee Code Annotated section 32-3-111 concerning the sale of specifically devised property.”
In Re Est. of Edward Greenamyre - Concurring/Dissenting (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-3-111 (Supp. 2005); see also The Uniform Probate Code, Sec.”
George Haskel Stewart v. Demple L. Sewell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 6× “13 It is codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-3-111 . Thus, Tennessee has joined the majority of jurisdictions that have abandoned the in specie doctrine upon which the Hume court relied.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.