Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-201 (2026)

Persons who may apply for voluntary admission

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 238,s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 2000, ch. 947, § 1; 2002, ch. 730, § 35; 2004, ch. 565, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: State v. Groves, 735 S.W.2d 843 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
State v. Groves, 735 S.W.2d 843 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 8× “By letter of May 20, 1986, the superintendent once again notified the committing court that, on the basis of two doctors’ opinions, the appellant was eligible for release under T.C.A. § 33-6-201 (Supp.1986). Following a hearing on June 17, 1986, the trial court determined that…”
State v. Simmons, 108 S.W.3d 881 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-6-201. Under section 33-6-206, the parent, legal guardian, or custodian who voluntarily admits an individual may request at any time that the mental health facility discharge the individual unless the subject had become “involuntarily committed” and is not…”
State v. Tripp, 754 S.W.2d 92 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “His findings and conclusions, stated in the order, indicated that he did not consider the out-patient treatment plan approved by MTMHI in accordance with T.C.A. § 33-6-201(b)(2) to be adequate to cover the patient’s needs, or the needs of the community.”
State of Tennessee v. Jackie H. Martin (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). · cites it 22× “However, in July 1994, staff members of WMHI notified Judge Axley, that, after the required six month evaluation of the appellant, they determined that, if "supportive community services [could] be worked out," the 3 Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-201 (1994 Supp.) provides that a…”
State of Tennessee v. Larry D. Simmons & Tyce Renard Jackson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-201 . Under section 33-6- 206, the parent, legal guardian, or custodian who voluntarily admits an individual may request at any time that the mental health facility discharge the individual unless the subject had become “involuntarily committed” and is not…”
State of Tennessee v. Kelly Brooke Frye (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). “esponsibilities; (2) Devote the offender to a specific employment or occupation; (3) Perform, without compensation, services in the community for charitable or governmental agencies; (4) Undergo available medical or psychiatric treatment and enter and remain in a specified…”
State of Tennessee v. Lavarne Madison (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “onsibilities; (2) Devote the offender to a specific employment or occupation; -6- (3) Perform without compensation services in the community for charitable or governmental agencies; (4) Undergo available medical or psychiatric treatment, and enter and remain in a specified…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-201(b) — 1 case
State v. Groves, 735 S.W.2d 843 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “By letter of May 20, 1986, the superintendent once again notified the committing court that, on the basis of two doctors’ opinions, the appellant was eligible for release under T.C.A. § 33-6-201 (Supp.1986). Following a hearing on June 17, 1986, the trial court determined that…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-201(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Tripp, 754 S.W.2d 92 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988). “His findings and conclusions, stated in the order, indicated that he did not consider the out-patient treatment plan approved by MTMHI in accordance with T.C.A. § 33-6-201(b)(2) to be adequate to cover the patient’s needs, or the needs of the community.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-201(b)(l)(D) — 1 case
State v. Groves, 735 S.W.2d 843 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “By letter of May 20, 1986, the superintendent once again notified the committing court that, on the basis of two doctors’ opinions, the appellant was eligible for release under T.C.A. § 33-6-201 (Supp.1986). Following a hearing on June 17, 1986, the trial court determined that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.