Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-127 (2026)

Availability of records to adopted persons and certain other persons for adoptions finalized or attempted prior to certain dates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 187, s 9, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 101, Secs.s 12, s 13, s 14, s 15, s 16 eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 101, s 11, eff. 7/1/2022.

Acts 1995, ch. 532, § 1; 1996, ch. 1054, §§ 80-83, 86, 129; 1996, ch. 1068, § 2; 1996, ch. 1079, § 69.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: White v. Thompson, 11 S.W.3d 913 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
White v. Thompson, 11 S.W.3d 913 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “Moreover, section 36-1-102(34) provides a somewhat similar, but broader definition of the looser term “parent” by stating: “‘Parent(s)’ means any biological, legal, adoptive parent(s) or, for purpose of §§ 36-1-127 — 36—1—141, stepparents.” Id.”
Belden v. Cabinet for Families & Child., 488 S.W.3d 45 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016). “228 (Westlaw 2016) (permitting adopted person, age 21 years or older, to received certified copy of original birth certificate); Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-127 (Westlaw 2016) (generally making adoption records open).”
In Re: Adoption of J.R.W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 8× “The Wife of the Adopter argues that the purpose of T.C.A. § 36-1-127 was to provide for stability in the life of an adopted child after being placed in a new environment and that this purpose would not be served by applying this statute in the instant case because, she alleges,…”
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 12× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-127 (c)(1). Other portions of the legislation, however, establish a procedure by which a birth parent or related individual can “veto” any contact with the adopted party who has received the records.”
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 9× “As such, Section 36-1-127(c) of the Tennessee Code is a substantive change in the law and not merely a procedural or remedial one.”
Amanda Carol Croslin & Phyllis Croslin Baker v. Danny Keith Croslin, wife Betty Jean Croslin & Stanley Gardner Haskins (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 36-1-127 (1991)5 provides in pertinent part: 36-1-127.”
Sandra Ann Pippin v. Christina Michelle Pippin (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “4 Chapter 1 of Title 36 governs adoption, and section 102 defines “parent” as “any biological, legal, adoptive parent or parents or, for purposes of §§ 36-1-127 -- 36-1-141, stepparents.” Tenn.”
In Re Ni'Kaiya R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “The term “parent” is defined broadly in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-102 as “any biological, legal, adoptive parent or parents or, for purposes of §§ 36-1-127—141, stepparents[.]” Tenn. Code Ann.”
In Re Steele M (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “The term parent is defined broadly in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-102 as “any biological, legal, adoptive parent or parents or, for purposes of §§ 36-1-127 -- 36-1-141, stepparents[.]” Tenn.”
In Re: Hayden C. G-J (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Moreover, section 36-1-102(34) provides a somewhat similar, but broader definition of the looser term “parent” by stating: “‘Parent(s)’ means any biological, legal, adoptive parent(s) or, for purpose of §§ 36-1-127–36-1-141, stepparents.” Id. § 36-1-102(34)[ 5 ].”
In Re: Aiden W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “continued) parent(s) or, for purposes of §§ 36-1-127 -- 36-1-141, stepparents[.]” (emphasis added).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-127(b): 1 case
In Re: Adoption of J.R.W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The Wife of the Adopter argues that the purpose of T.C.A. § 36-1-127 was to provide for stability in the life of an adopted child after being placed in a new environment and that this purpose would not be served by applying this statute in the instant case because, she alleges,…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-127(c): 2 cases
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “As such, Section 36-1-127(c) of the Tennessee Code is a substantive change in the law and not merely a procedural or remedial one.”
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. 1999). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-127 (c)(1). Other portions of the legislation, however, establish a procedure by which a birth parent or related individual can “veto” any contact with the adopted party who has received the records.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-127(c)(1): 1 case
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “As such, Section 36-1-127(c) of the Tennessee Code is a substantive change in the law and not merely a procedural or remedial one.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.