Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-2207 (2026)

Determination of controlling child support order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2010, ch. 901, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2013 · leading case: State of Tennessee ex rel., Mary Saucier v. Matthew Parker (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
State of Tennessee ex rel., Mary Saucier v. Matthew Parker (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “The State contends that the trial court erred in holding that it did not have jurisdiction because the California order was the “controlling order” under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-2207 (a), and that registration of the California order for purposes of enforcement was proper…”
Dawn Eileen Shannon v. Thomas Rex Shannon (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “If two or more tribunals have issued child support orders for the same obligor and child, the order that controls and must be so recognized under § 36-5-2207 establishes the aspects of the support order which are nonmodifiable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.