Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-116 (2026)

Place of detention - Escape or attempted escape - Shelter care - Use of seclusion

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 252, s 2, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 492, s 3, eff. 5/25/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 252, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1052, s 13, eff. 7/1/2018.

Acts 1970, ch. 600, § 16; 1983, ch. 408, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 37-216; Acts 1984, ch. 995, § 1; 1989, ch. 278, § 38; 1989, ch. 329, § 1; 1994, ch. 817, § 1; 1996, ch. 1079, § 73; 1999, ch. 508, § 6; 2000, ch. 981, § 51; 2008 , ch. 1083, § 1; 2010 , ch. 803, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: State v. Walls, 62 S.W.3d 119 (Tenn. 2001).
State v. Walls, 62 S.W.3d 119 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 2× “, Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-116(e) (2001) ("No child may be detained in any jail or other facility for the detention of adults, except as provided .”
State v. Carroll, 36 S.W.3d 854 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 37-1-116 (1996) explicitly limits appropriate places of detention for juveniles, as opposed to custody of juveniles, to facilities including “detention homes or centers for delinquent children which are under the direction or supervision of the court or other public authority”…”
In Re C.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-116 (g)(1). “Reasonable efforts entail more than simply providing parents with a list of service providers and sending them on their way.”
State of Tennessee v. Allen Kelley (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. §37-1-116 (j). A primary purpose of the legislation governing juvenile courts and proceedings is to remove “the taint of criminality and consequences of criminal behavior.”
In the Matter of L.F.B. & D.M.D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-116 (g)(1). One factor to consider is the parent’s efforts to remedy the situation so that reunification is possible.”
Doe 1 v. State of Tennessee, The (M.D. Tenn. 2025). “§ 37-1-116(a)(4)). DCS and Quin (“DCS Defendants”) “are responsible for oversight of JDCs, which are either licensed by DCS Defendants or approved by them[.”
Walter Fletcher v. Deanna M. Fletcher (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 37-1-116. . . . -6- appealed de novo to circuit court.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-116(a)(4) — 1 case
Doe 1 v. State of Tennessee, The (M.D. Tenn. 2025). “§ 37-1-116(a)(4)). DCS and Quin (“DCS Defendants”) “are responsible for oversight of JDCs, which are either licensed by DCS Defendants or approved by them[.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-116(e) — 1 case
State v. Walls, 62 S.W.3d 119 (Tenn. 2001). “, Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-116(e) (2001) ("No child may be detained in any jail or other facility for the detention of adults, except as provided .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.