Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 (2026)

Qualifications of police officers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person employed as a full-time police officer, and any person employed or utilized as a part-time, temporary, reserve or auxiliary police officer or as a special deputy, shall:

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 114,s 7, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 498, s 2, eff. 5/20/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 137, s 4, eff. 4/12/2013.

Acts 1981, ch. 455, § 6; T.C.A., § 38-11-106; Acts 1983, ch. 270, § 6; 1988, ch. 968, § 2; 1990, ch. 1094, § 2; 1993, ch. 374, § 2; 2001, ch. 42, § 1; 2009 , ch. 264, § 1; 2012 , ch. 848, § 12.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: Wright v. Tennessee Peace Officer Standards & Training Comm'n, 277 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
Wright v. Tennessee Peace Officer Standards & Training Comm'n, 277 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 30× “In the end, however, the commissioners concluded that, under their rules, they were obligated to find Wright in violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 38-8-106 because of his guilty plea— despite the lack of a conviction, and despite the subsequent expungement — but also concluded that…”
In Re: Application of Tony Cox (seeking to qualify as agent for Memphis Bonding) & State of Tennessee v. Cheryl D. Gray & Samuel R. Brisco, 389 S.W.3d 794 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Likening the disqualification provision in code section 38-8-106, which prohibited a convicted felon from serving as a police officer, with the disqualification provision in code section 40-11-128, which prohibited a convicted felon from serving as a bondsman or bondsman’s…”
Mickel G. Hoback v. City of Chattanooga, 492 S.W.3d 248 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 5× “These standards are found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 and the Rules of the .”
Ashton v. City of Memphis, 49 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (W.D. Tenn. 1999). · cites it 6× “The qualifications for police officers in Tennessee are set forth in Tenn.Code Ann. § 38-8-106.... Since the qualifications for these positions winnow out a significant portion of the general workforce, there indeed is a possibility that the racial composition of the qualified…”
Corder v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 852 S.W.2d 910 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “§ 38-8-105 and T.C.A. § 38-8-106 and were a proximate cause of the decedent’s death.”
Aiken v. City of Memphis, 37 F.3d 1155 (6th Cir. 1994). “The qualifications for police officers in Tennessee are set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 . 5 The qualifications *1166 for firefighters in Tennessee are very similar and are set forth in Tenn.”
Hargrove v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville, 154 S.W.3d 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “8 provides that: [a]ny officer who leaves the Metropolitan Police Department must meet the requirements of state law (T.C.A. 38-8-106 or as amended), before he [or she] can be considered for reemployment.”
Madison Cnty., Tennessee v. Vatisha Evans-Barken (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 18× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 (9). Not only are officers required to complete this psychological evaluation pre-employment, but veteran officers are likewise required to complete a new psychological evaluation “[a]fter a six month break in full-time law -9- enforcement service” or…”
Vatisha Evans-Barken v. Madison Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 . In or around April 2014, Appellee went on medical leave.”
Bee Deselm v. Tennessee Peace Officers Standards & Training Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 13× “03-071, in which the Attorney General’s office opined that a finding of criminal contempt in a civil matter “may not be considered a criminal conviction for the violation of a law relating to force, violence, theft, or dishonesty” within the meaning of either Tenn. Code Ann. §…”
Mickel Hoback v. City of Chattanooga (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 8× “These standards are found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 and the Rules of the Tennessee Peace Officers Standards and Training Commission (POST).”
Rodolfo Castro v. Peace Officer Standards & Training Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 7× “We hold that the POST Commission failed to adopt criteria for exceptions and waivers as required by Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 . For reasons other than those used by the trial court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court, but modify the judgment to vacate the POST…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106(4) — 4 cases
Wright v. Tennessee Peace Officer Standards & Training Comm'n, 277 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “In the end, however, the commissioners concluded that, under their rules, they were obligated to find Wright in violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 38-8-106 because of his guilty plea— despite the lack of a conviction, and despite the subsequent expungement — but also concluded that…”
Ashton v. City of Memphis, 49 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (W.D. Tenn. 1999). “The qualifications for police officers in Tennessee are set forth in Tenn.Code Ann. § 38-8-106.... Since the qualifications for these positions winnow out a significant portion of the general workforce, there indeed is a possibility that the racial composition of the qualified…”
Bee Deselm v. Tennessee Peace Officers Standards & Training Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “03-071, in which the Attorney General’s office opined that a finding of criminal contempt in a civil matter “may not be considered a criminal conviction for the violation of a law relating to force, violence, theft, or dishonesty” within the meaning of either Tenn. Code Ann. §…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106(8) — 1 case
Bee Deselm v. Tennessee Peace Officers Standards & Training Comm'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “03-071, in which the Attorney General’s office opined that a finding of criminal contempt in a civil matter “may not be considered a criminal conviction for the violation of a law relating to force, violence, theft, or dishonesty” within the meaning of either Tenn. Code Ann. §…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106(9) — 2 cases
Madison Cnty., Tennessee v. Vatisha Evans-Barken (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 (9). Not only are officers required to complete this psychological evaluation pre-employment, but veteran officers are likewise required to complete a new psychological evaluation “[a]fter a six month break in full-time law -9- enforcement service” or…”
Vatisha Evans-Barken v. Madison Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 38-8-106 . In or around April 2014, Appellee went on medical leave.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.