Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (2026)

Trafficking for commercial sex act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1115, s 13, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1115, Secs.s14, s21 eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1089, s 4, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 123, s 2, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 123, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 634, s 1, eff. 3/23/2016.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 465, s 2, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 2008 , ch. 1140, § 3; 2012, ch. 1075, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Westley A. Albright, 564 S.W.3d 809 (Tenn. 2018).
State of Tennessee v. Westley A. Albright, 564 S.W.3d 809 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 2× “(6) Sexual battery, pursuant to § 39-13-505; (7) Statutory rape, pursuant to § 39-13-506; (8) Especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, pursuant to § 39-17- 1005; (9) Sexual activity involving a minor, pursuant to § 39-13-529; (10) Trafficking for commercial sex…”
Washington v. Robertson Cnty., 29 S.W.3d 466 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-309(d) and (e) (1997).”
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Marquis Jeffries (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). · cites it 10× “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a)(1). The alternative trafficking charge required proof that the Defendant recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, purchased, or obtained by any other means, another person for the purpose of providing a commercial sex act.”
State of Tennessee v. Clyde E. Willis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). · cites it 8× “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a) (Supp. 2021) (subsequently amended).”
State of Tennessee v. Carmen Noe Garcia Guox (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). · cites it 8× “” Defendant argues without citation to authority that the phrase “is punishable as trafficking for commercial sex acts under § 39-13-309” only “speaks to the manner of service, i.”
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Cornelius Baylis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024). · cites it 7× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (a)(1). When the statutory definition of a criminal offense includes the attempt to commit a certain act, “the -11- crime is committed if the attempt is made, regardless of whether it is successful and even regardless of whether the objective would be…”
Rickius Grant v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). · cites it 6× “a second response, arguing that in addition to the petition being time-barred, Ashley was inapplicable to the Petitioner’s case because Ashley addressed convictions of solicitation of a minor pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-528, whereas the Petitioner pled…”
State of Tennessee v. Ivan Ashley (Tenn. Crim. App. 2023). · cites it 5× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (c) (2018). Initially, we note that while the first page of the indictment listed count one as patronizing prostitution from a minor, the wording of count one alleged that he patronized prostitution from a law enforcement officer posing as a minor.”
State of Tennessee v. Randall Ray Ward (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (a)(1)-(2). For the purposes of subsection (a)(2), other means may include: (1) Causing or threatening to cause physical harm to the person; (2) Physically restraining or threatening to physically restrain the person; (3) Abusing or threatening to…”
In Re: Cidney L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (a)(2) provides: “A person commits the offense of trafficking a person for a commercial sex act who .”
In Re L.M.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “reasonably - 12 - be expected to produce severe psychosis, severe neurotic disorder, severe depression, severe developmental delays or intellectual disability, or severe impairment of the child’s ability to function adequately in the child’s environment, and the knowing failure…”
State of Tennessee v. Ryan Patrick Broadrick (2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 . The State also filed a motion for the trial court to reconsider its ruling excluding the Defendant’s internet history.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(3) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Randall Ray Ward (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (a)(1)-(2). For the purposes of subsection (a)(2), other means may include: (1) Causing or threatening to cause physical harm to the person; (2) Physically restraining or threatening to physically restrain the person; (3) Abusing or threatening to…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(a) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Clyde E. Willis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a) (Supp. 2021) (subsequently amended).”
State of Tennessee v. Carmen Noe Garcia Guox (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). “” Defendant argues without citation to authority that the phrase “is punishable as trafficking for commercial sex acts under § 39-13-309” only “speaks to the manner of service, i.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(a)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Marquis Jeffries (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a)(1). The alternative trafficking charge required proof that the Defendant recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, purchased, or obtained by any other means, another person for the purpose of providing a commercial sex act.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(a)(2) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Marquis Jeffries (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a)(1). The alternative trafficking charge required proof that the Defendant recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, purchased, or obtained by any other means, another person for the purpose of providing a commercial sex act.”
State of Tennessee v. Clyde E. Willis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a) (Supp. 2021) (subsequently amended).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(a)(3) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Clyde E. Willis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a) (Supp. 2021) (subsequently amended).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(b) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Clyde E. Willis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a) (Supp. 2021) (subsequently amended).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(b)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Marquis Jeffries (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “T.C.A. § 39-13-309(a)(1). The alternative trafficking charge required proof that the Defendant recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, purchased, or obtained by any other means, another person for the purpose of providing a commercial sex act.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(c)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Carmen Noe Garcia Guox (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). “” Defendant argues without citation to authority that the phrase “is punishable as trafficking for commercial sex acts under § 39-13-309” only “speaks to the manner of service, i.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(d) — 2 cases
Washington v. Robertson Cnty., 29 S.W.3d 466 (Tenn. 2000). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-309(d) and (e) (1997).”
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Cornelius Baylis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (a)(1). When the statutory definition of a criminal offense includes the attempt to commit a certain act, “the -11- crime is committed if the attempt is made, regardless of whether it is successful and even regardless of whether the objective would be…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309(d)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Cornelius Baylis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-309 (a)(1). When the statutory definition of a criminal offense includes the attempt to commit a certain act, “the -11- crime is committed if the attempt is made, regardless of whether it is successful and even regardless of whether the objective would be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.