Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (2026)

Release from community supervision

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1996, ch. 972, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Calvert v. State, 342 S.W.3d 477 (Tenn. 2011).
Calvert v. State, 342 S.W.3d 477 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 3× “§ 39-13-525(a) (2006). After Defendant testified about what the probation officer had told him about community supervision following probation, Defendant’s attorney asked, “If you would have known about that[,] how would that have affected your decision?” Defendant answered, “I…”
Craig Robert Nunn v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 547 S.W.3d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (d)(2). The petitioner may also offer witnesses and other proof at the hearing.”
State v. Levandowski, 955 S.W.2d 603 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (b)(Supp. 1996)("the district attorney general shall conduct a criminal history check.”
Derrick Brandon Bush v. State of Tennessee, 428 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 2× “According to Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (2010), "[ajfter a person sentenced to community supervision pursuant to [Tenn.”
Carlos Ortiz v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 . The Apprendi doctrine requires that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Derrick Brandon Bush v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 2× “According to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (2010), “[a]fter a person sentenced to community supervision pursuant to [Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Benny S. Towns (2018). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-524 (c). A defendant serving a community supervision for life sentence can petition the sentencing court for release after fifteen years of service.”
Marcus Ward v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009). “§ 39-13-525(a). Given the protective and rehabilitative aims of sex offender community supervision and the similarities to regular parole, by extension of our supreme court’s reasoning in Jaco, we conclude that community supervision is not punishment but, instead, a collateral…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525(a) — 3 cases
Calvert v. State, 342 S.W.3d 477 (Tenn. 2011). “§ 39-13-525(a) (2006). After Defendant testified about what the probation officer had told him about community supervision following probation, Defendant’s attorney asked, “If you would have known about that[,] how would that have affected your decision?” Defendant answered, “I…”
Craig Robert Nunn v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 547 S.W.3d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (d)(2). The petitioner may also offer witnesses and other proof at the hearing.”
Marcus Ward v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009). “§ 39-13-525(a). Given the protective and rehabilitative aims of sex offender community supervision and the similarities to regular parole, by extension of our supreme court’s reasoning in Jaco, we conclude that community supervision is not punishment but, instead, a collateral…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525(b) — 1 case
State v. Levandowski, 955 S.W.2d 603 (Tenn. 1997). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-525 (b)(Supp. 1996)("the district attorney general shall conduct a criminal history check.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.