Tenn. Code Ann. » Tenn. Code / Title 39 / Chapter 13 / Part 7
Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-701 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Tennessee Standardized Treatment Program for Sex Offenders."

Acts 1995, ch. 353, § 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: State v. Reams, 265 S.W.3d 423 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Reams, 265 S.W.3d 423 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “§§ 39-13-701, -702 (2006). The legislative intent in creating the program is so that offenders will curtail recidivistic behavior, and so that the protection of victims and potential victims will be enhanced.”
Craig Robert Nunn v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 547 S.W.3d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-701 , et seq. The Act declared that “the comprehensive evaluation, identification, treatment, and continued monitoring of sex offenders who are subject to the supervision of the criminal justice system are necessary in order to work toward the elimination…”
State of Tennessee v. Westley A. Albright, 564 S.W.3d 809 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 2× “Analysis We deem it helpful to begin our analysis with a brief review of the pertinent provisions of the Tennessee Standardized Treatment Program for Sex Offenders, set forth 6 at Tennessee Code Annotated sections 39-13-701 through -709 (2014) (“the Treatment Act”).”
State v. Samuel, 243 S.W.3d 592 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “He is subject to the STSO Act under T.C.A. 39-13-701, and the SORM Act under T.”
Wooden v. Lee (W.D. Tenn. 2025). · cites it 3× “See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-701 , 39-13-706.”
State of Tennessee v. Mustapha Boutchiche (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “After his conviction, the defendant filed a pleading styled “Motion to Prohibit the Requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-701 through § 39-13-709 From Being Applied to [the Defendant] Before Sentencing and Before Completion of His Appeals.”
State of Tennessee v. Paul Swanson (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “See generally Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-701 et seq. (1997) (Tennessee Standardized Treatment Program for Sex Offenders Act); Tenn.”
State v. Wilbert Heller (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. §§39-13-701 - 709 (Supp. 1995).”
State of Tennessee v. William A. Marshall (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). “§§ 39-13-701, -702 (1997). -5- I. Procedural Challenge to the Revocation order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.