Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308 (2026)

Harassment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 797,s 4, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 797,s 3, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 797,s 2, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 797,s 1, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 884, Secs.s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5 eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 884, s 1, eff. 7/1/2016.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1998, ch. 1035, §§ 1, 2; 2001, ch. 26, § 1; 2008 , ch. 973, § 1; 2009 , ch. 347, § 1; 2011 , ch. 362, §§ 1-4; 2012 , ch. 992, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: State v. Lakatos, 900 S.W.2d 699 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).
State v. Lakatos, 900 S.W.2d 699 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 18× “Appellant Rob Lakatos was charged under T.C.A. § 39-17-308(a)(2) with twenty-nine (29) counts of making harassing telephone calls.”
Washington v. Robertson Cnty., 29 S.W.3d 466 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 8× “§ 4-21-701 no longer refers to a specific criminal statute, malicious harassment should be defined by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308 , which is cross-referenced after § -701 and proscribes harassment by telephone or in writing.”
State v. Smith, 891 S.W.2d 922 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-308(a)(2) (1991). 24 .”
Young v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 868 F. Supp. 937 (W.D. Tenn. 1994). · cites it 4× “Defendant argues that Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-308, a criminal section making it illegal to threaten persons over the telephone, provides the basis for the civil cause of action for malicious harassment because that section is entitled “Harassment.”
State v. Hoxie, 963 S.W.2d 737 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-315 (1994 Supp.). 2 .”
United States v. Clifford Houston, 683 F. App'x 434 (6th Cir. 2017). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308 (criminalizing knowing threats made over the telephone).”
State v. Gieck, 29 S.W.3d 57 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-308 (1997 Repl.). Id.”
Kendra C. Smith v. Thistle Farms, et al. (M.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 6× “Smith, brought against the Individual Defendants be dismissed; (2) the Clerk administratively terminate the Individual Defendants as defendants in this action; (3) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Thistle Farms brought pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-17-308 (for…”
Hall v. City of Knoxville, Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 5× “Background2 Plaintiff’s claims arise from his arrest for harassment in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-308. Plaintiff engaged in a relationship with a woman for less than one month [Doc.”
Reid v. Pressley (E.D. Tenn. 2019). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308 (c). Courts have held, however, that Tennessee’s harassment statute does not create a private cause of action because it is a criminal statue and, as such, defines crimes and defenses.”
Ragland, II v. F & M Koz, Inc (W.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 4× “23, 2018) (“Regarding Plaintiff's claim under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308 , the statute does not create a private cause of action.”
State of Tennessee v. Michael Wiss (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014). · cites it 6× “On November 10, 2011, an indictment was returned charging Appellant with unlawfully and intentionally communicating in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 39-17-308 for the incidents on or about June 25, 2011 through July 1, 2011.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308(1): 1 case
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308(2): 2 cases
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308(a): 4 cases
Washington v. Robertson Cnty., 29 S.W.3d 466 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 4-21-701 no longer refers to a specific criminal statute, malicious harassment should be defined by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308 , which is cross-referenced after § -701 and proscribes harassment by telephone or in writing.”
Hall v. City of Knoxville, Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “Background2 Plaintiff’s claims arise from his arrest for harassment in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-308. Plaintiff engaged in a relationship with a woman for less than one month [Doc.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308(a)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Michael Wiss (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014). “On November 10, 2011, an indictment was returned charging Appellant with unlawfully and intentionally communicating in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 39-17-308 for the incidents on or about June 25, 2011 through July 1, 2011.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308(a)(1)(A): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Andre Davis, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-308(a)(2): 4 cases
State v. Lakatos, 900 S.W.2d 699 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). “Appellant Rob Lakatos was charged under T.C.A. § 39-17-308(a)(2) with twenty-nine (29) counts of making harassing telephone calls.”
State v. Smith, 891 S.W.2d 922 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-308(a)(2) (1991). 24 .”
State of Tennessee v. Ibrahim Talafhah (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.