Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in
the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email.
Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps —
claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the
rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it
off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode,
which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live
credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken
office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under
“Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call
904-383-7448.
Tenn. Code Ann.
» Tenn. Code / Title 39 / Chapter 17 / Part 4
(a) This part and title 53, chapter 11, parts 3 and 4 shall be known and may be cited as the "Tennessee Drug Control Act of 1989."
(b) Except as otherwise expressly permitted by state law, the state preempts the entire field of determining the appropriate sanction for conduct involving a drug or other substance that is classified by this part or title 53, chapter 11, as a Class A or B misdemeanor or a Class A, B, C, D, or E felony. No county, city, town, municipality, or metropolitan form of government has the authority by ordinance, resolution, regulation, or other local law to enact or adopt a sanction for conduct involving a drug or other substance if the sanction for that conduct is established by this part or title 53, chapter 11, as a criminal offense other than a Class C misdemeanor. Any ordinance, resolution, regulation, or other local law enacted or adopted prior to April 12, 2017, regulating drugs and other substances that is inconsistent with this part and title 53, chapter 11, is superseded and repealed. Any policy, guideline, or practice of any agency, department, or employee of a county, city, town, municipality, or metropolitan form of government that regulates or permits the enforcement of conduct covered by this subsection (b) in a manner inconsistent with state law is void.
Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 124,s 1, eff. 4/12/2017.
Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1999–2016 · leading case: State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-401. This act defines drug related charges, defines and schedules controlled substances, and sets penalties.”
State v. Jenkins, 15 S.W.3d 914 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2דThe state responds that the Act requires no mens rea component because it merely enhances punishment for certain violations of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401 , et seq., and is not a separate offense statute.”
Charles A. Harmon v. James J.J. Jones (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2ד2 The appellants asserted that they had not violated any law that justified the KCSD seizing their property under the Tennessee Drug Control Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-401, et seq. or the forfeiture provision of Tennessee Code Annotated section 53-11-451 ( Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Charles Lincoln Falkner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). · cites it 2ד” T.C.A. § 39-17-401(6) (1997). “Sale” is defined by case law as “a bargained for, offer and acceptance and an actual or constructive transfer or delivery of the substance.”
State of Tennessee v. Roshad Romanic Siler (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 2דTennessee Code Annotated sections 39-17-401 to -451 are known as the Tennessee Drug Control Act and are a comprehensive scheme designed to regulate the illegal traffic in and use of controlled substances, certain counterfeit substances, and drug paraphernalia.”
Cook v. Dep't of Saf. State of Tennessee (In Re Cook), 421 B.R. 446 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2דOn February 24, 2009, approximately five months prior to entry of the debtors’ discharge, the debtors’ 1999 Nissan Alti-ma, (“Nissan”), was seized by the State of Tennessee Department of Safety, (“Department of Safety”), and the Jackson Metro Narcotics Unit, (“Narcotics Unit”)…”
State of Tennessee v. Charles William Reed (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “The affidavit sought to establish that the police had “probable cause to believe that certain evidence of criminal activity, to wit: violations of state laws as set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 39-17-401 et seq. [Tennessee Drug Control Act of 1989], will be found…”
State vs.Jasper D. Lewis (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-401(b) (1997). The sentence for a Range I offender convicted of a Class C felony is between three and six years.”
Knoll Pharm. Co. v. Sherman, 57 F. Supp. 2d 615 (N.D. Ill. 1999). “(Mi-chie 1998); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-401 et seq., 53-11-301 et seq.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401(6) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Charles Lincoln Falkner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). “” T.C.A. § 39-17-401(6) (1997). “Sale” is defined by case law as “a bargained for, offer and acceptance and an actual or constructive transfer or delivery of the substance.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401(b) — 1 case
State vs.Jasper D. Lewis (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-401(b) (1997). The sentence for a Range I offender convicted of a Class C felony is between three and six years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.