Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401 (2026)

Tennessee Drug Control Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 124,s 1, eff. 4/12/2017.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1999–2016 · leading case: State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-401. This act defines drug related charges, defines and schedules controlled substances, and sets penalties.”
State v. Jenkins, 15 S.W.3d 914 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The state responds that the Act requires no mens rea component because it merely enhances punishment for certain violations of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401 , et seq., and is not a separate offense statute.”
Vernon Lockhart v. Comm'r of The Tennessee Dep't of Saf. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401 , et. seq.; 53-11-451 (“Tennessee Drug Control Act”).”
Charles A. Harmon v. James J.J. Jones (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “2 The appellants asserted that they had not violated any law that justified the KCSD seizing their property under the Tennessee Drug Control Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-401, et seq. or the forfeiture provision of Tennessee Code Annotated section 53-11-451 ( Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Charles Lincoln Falkner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “” T.C.A. § 39-17-401(6) (1997). “Sale” is defined by case law as “a bargained for, offer and acceptance and an actual or constructive transfer or delivery of the substance.”
State of Tennessee v. Roshad Romanic Siler (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated sections 39-17-401 to -451 are known as the Tennessee Drug Control Act and are a comprehensive scheme designed to regulate the illegal traffic in and use of controlled substances, certain counterfeit substances, and drug paraphernalia.”
Cook v. Dep't of Saf. State of Tennessee (In Re Cook), 421 B.R. 446 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “On February 24, 2009, approximately five months prior to entry of the debtors’ discharge, the debtors’ 1999 Nissan Alti-ma, (“Nissan”), was seized by the State of Tennessee Department of Safety, (“Department of Safety”), and the Jackson Metro Narcotics Unit, (“Narcotics Unit”)…”
State of Tennessee v. Charles William Reed (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “The affidavit sought to establish that the police had “probable cause to believe that certain evidence of criminal activity, to wit: violations of state laws as set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 39-17-401 et seq. [Tennessee Drug Control Act of 1989], will be found…”
State vs.Jasper D. Lewis (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-401(b) (1997). The sentence for a Range I offender convicted of a Class C felony is between three and six years.”
Knoll Pharm. Co. v. Sherman, 57 F. Supp. 2d 615 (N.D. Ill. 1999). “(Mi-chie 1998); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-401 et seq., 53-11-301 et seq.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401(6) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Charles Lincoln Falkner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). “” T.C.A. § 39-17-401(6) (1997). “Sale” is defined by case law as “a bargained for, offer and acceptance and an actual or constructive transfer or delivery of the substance.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-401(b) — 1 case
State vs.Jasper D. Lewis (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-401(b) (1997). The sentence for a Range I offender convicted of a Class C felony is between three and six years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.