Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 450, s 33, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 143, s 7, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 65, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 507, s 2, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 126, s 3, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 126, s 2, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 978, s 2, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 134, s 23, eff. 4/14/2015.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 945, § 1; 2001, ch. 439, § 1; 2007 , ch. 349, § 1; 2009 , ch. 267, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: State v. Burkhart, 58 S.W.3d 694 (Tenn. 2001).
State v. Burkhart, 58 S.W.3d 694 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 28× “We granted this appeal to determine the constitutionality of Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-501 and 39-17-505.”
State v. Price, 124 S.W.3d 135 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “The certified question of law on appeal is whether Tennessee Code Annotated sections 39-14-901, -903, Money Laundering Act of 1996, violates Article XI, Section 8 or Article I, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution by exempting from its application violation of gambling laws,…”
United States v. Dicristina, 886 F. Supp. 2d 164 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 , Sentencing Commission Comments (“The definition of ‘gambling’ includes .”
State of Tennessee v. George Arvil Vance & Vincent Vance (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 17× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 (1) (1997). A lawful business transaction “includes any futures or commodities trading.”
Capital Partners Network OT, Inc. v. TNG Contractors, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Tennessee law states, “Gambling is contrary to the public policy of this state” ( Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 ), yet foreign judgments for gambling debts amassed in other states are granted full faith and credit in Tennessee: [B]oth gambling and the promotion of gambling are…”
Sandra Duckworth v. Yellow Soc. Interactive, Ltd. (6th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 (2). At common law, gambling losses were not recoverable.”
Sandra Duckworth v. Yellow Soc. Interactive, Ltd. (6th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 (2). At common law, gambling losses were not recoverable.”
Maxine Nelson v. The Pacesetter Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “As winnowed, the plaintiff alleges that she was discharged because she refused to participate in gambling activities which were illegal under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 . The plaintiff was initially employed in November 1993.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.