Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (2026)

Collection of fines, costs and litigation taxes - Installment payment plan - Suspended license - Restricted license - Conversion to civil judgment - Settlement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 413, s 1, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 410, s 8, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 438, s 6, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 438, s 5, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 579, s 1, eff. 3/16/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 538, s 1, eff. 3/7/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 412, Secs.s 2, s 3, s 4eff. 1/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 412, s 1, eff. 1/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 149, s 1, eff. 4/17/2017.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 257, s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 737, Secs.s 1, s 2eff. 4/22/2014.

Acts 1972, ch. 729, § 3; T.C.A., §§ 40-3209, 40-3205; Acts 1991, ch. 467, § 1; 1992, ch. 956, § 1; 1996, ch. 826, § 1; 1996, ch. 920, §1; 1997 , ch. 325, §§1, 2; 2007 , ch. 167, §§1, 2; 2009 , ch. 570, §1; 2009 , ch. 577, §2; 2011 , ch. 504, §§ 1-3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).
Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 101× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b). Thomas and Hixson sue on behalf of themselves and a not fully known number of similarly situated Tennesseans who, they argue, have had their right to drive taken away solely based on the fact that they are indigent and therefore cannot pay…”
Thomas v. Haslam, 329 F. Supp. 3d 475 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 121× “In particular, when a defendant has little or no income or assets, garnishment and execution will be of little use, because no tool is sufficient to collect from resources that do not exist.”
Owens v. State, 710 S.W.2d 518 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 40-24-105 deals with the collection of fines and costs as follows: “(a) Unless discharged by payment or service of imprisonment in default of a fine, a fine may be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action.”
Rodriguez v. Providence Cmty. Corr., Inc., 191 F. Supp. 3d 758 (M.D. Tenn. 2016). · cites it 2× “Opposition to the Private Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs refer to Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 , which states that the debts at issue here, fines and the attendant administrative *775 costs, “may be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action.”
People v. Howell, 64 P.3d 894 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (a) (2001)(costs are not part of criminal penalty); Va.”
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Smith (In Re Smith), 317 B.R. 302 (Bankr. D. Md. 2004). “at 108 (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b) (1982)). Finding that the costs were assessed against the defendant as a condition of his probation, the Sixth Circuit determined that the debt was part of the penalty under the Kelly analysis.”
State v. Johnson, 980 S.W.2d 410 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “An assessment of costs, moreover, appears to be an appropriate condition of probation under this section_ We believe that section 40-24-105(b) of the Tennessee Code, which provides that costs ‘shall not be deemed part to the penalty’ in a criminal case, and upon which the…”
In Re Barry Dale Hollis & Tammy Lanelle Hollis, Debtors. State of Tennessee v. Barry Dale Hollis, 810 F.2d 106 (6th Cir. 1987). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b) (1982). Discussion In its appeal to this Court, the State argues that the lower courts erred in determining that the assessment of costs is a dischargeable debt.”
Thomas v. Haslam (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 30× “” revocations were carried out pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b), which stated, at the time, that an individual’s driver’s license shall be revoked by the commissioner of safety if the licensee has not paid all litigation taxes, court costs, and fines assessed as a…”
State of Tennessee v. Kendall Southall (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “Alternatively, the State argued that Code section 28-3-110 was limited to civil cases and did not restrict the collection of costs, fines, and taxes assessed in criminal matters pursuant to Code section 40-24-105. On July 14, 2017, the trial court held a hearing on the…”
Hood v. Baggett (E.D. Tenn. 2019). · cites it 2× “to be a “preemptive, retroactive, liability, class-action, civil + criminal law suit” to vindicate the rights of a class of plaintiffs: (1) who were assessed a fine as a part of a criminal sentence(s) and/or judgments of conviction in the State of Tennessee; (2) whose sentences…”
Nashville Cmty. Bail Fund, The v. Howard Gentry (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 ; Tenn. R. Civ.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105(a) — 4 cases
Owens v. State, 710 S.W.2d 518 (Tenn. 1986). “T.C.A. § 40-24-105 deals with the collection of fines and costs as follows: “(a) Unless discharged by payment or service of imprisonment in default of a fine, a fine may be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action.”
State of Tennessee v. Kendall Southall (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). “Alternatively, the State argued that Code section 28-3-110 was limited to civil cases and did not restrict the collection of costs, fines, and taxes assessed in criminal matters pursuant to Code section 40-24-105. On July 14, 2017, the trial court held a hearing on the…”
State of Tennessee v. Christian Workman (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
State v. James E. Lampkin (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105(b) — 3 cases
Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b). Thomas and Hixson sue on behalf of themselves and a not fully known number of similarly situated Tennesseans who, they argue, have had their right to drive taken away solely based on the fact that they are indigent and therefore cannot pay…”
Thomas v. Haslam, 329 F. Supp. 3d 475 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “In particular, when a defendant has little or no income or assets, garnishment and execution will be of little use, because no tool is sufficient to collect from resources that do not exist.”
State v. Johnson, 980 S.W.2d 410 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). “An assessment of costs, moreover, appears to be an appropriate condition of probation under this section_ We believe that section 40-24-105(b) of the Tennessee Code, which provides that costs ‘shall not be deemed part to the penalty’ in a criminal case, and upon which the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105(b)(2) — 2 cases
Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b). Thomas and Hixson sue on behalf of themselves and a not fully known number of similarly situated Tennesseans who, they argue, have had their right to drive taken away solely based on the fact that they are indigent and therefore cannot pay…”
Thomas v. Haslam, 329 F. Supp. 3d 475 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “In particular, when a defendant has little or no income or assets, garnishment and execution will be of little use, because no tool is sufficient to collect from resources that do not exist.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105(h) — 2 cases
Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-105 (b). Thomas and Hixson sue on behalf of themselves and a not fully known number of similarly situated Tennesseans who, they argue, have had their right to drive taken away solely based on the fact that they are indigent and therefore cannot pay…”
Thomas v. Haslam, 329 F. Supp. 3d 475 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). “In particular, when a defendant has little or no income or assets, garnishment and execution will be of little use, because no tool is sufficient to collect from resources that do not exist.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.