Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117 (2026)

Grounds for parole - Terms

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 874,s 2, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 671,s 3, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 993, s 13, eff. 7/1/2016.

Acts 1937, ch. 276, § 9; C. Supp. 1950, § 11818.9 (Williams, § 11843.9); Acts 1961, ch. 93, § 11; 1974, ch. 624, § 5; 1975, ch. 99, § 1; 1979, ch. 313, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 40-3614; Acts 1989, ch. 227, §§ 31-33; 2014, ch. 567, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 59 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: State v. Turner, 297 S.W.3d 155 (Tenn. 2009).
State v. Turner, 297 S.W.3d 155 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 8× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a). It is a privilege the State of Tennessee may accord to persons incarcerated for committing serious felonies in spite of worrisome statistics of recidivism.”
Kaylor v. Bradley, 912 S.W.2d 728 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a). Likewise, eligible inmates do not have a vested right to be considered for early release because the governor retains the power to alter the eligibility criteria at any time and because the opportunity to be considered for early release lapses…”
Hickman v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles, 78 S.W.3d 285 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “Hickman’s petition, to the extent that it sought judicial relief based on Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117 (b), failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
Danny A. Stewart v. Derrick D. Schofield, Comm'r, Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 368 S.W.3d 457 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 2× “, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 40-28-117(a) (2006), 40-35-503(b) (2010); State v.”
Joseph Brennan v. Bd. of Parole For The State of Tennessee, 512 S.W.3d 871 (Tenn. 2017). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 40-28-117 (a)(.), 40-35-503(b); Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Janet Michelle Stanfield, Tony Alan Winsett & Justin Bradley Stanfield, 554 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 2× “§ 40-28-117(a) (2006). Under Tennessee's statutory scheme, persons released outside of prison walls on parole remain in the legal custody of the warden (or relevant penal supervisor) and are subject to all of the provisions upon which their parole is conditioned.”
McIntyre v. Traughber, 884 S.W.2d 134 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Acts 612, 614-15, now codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117(b) (1990). 2 .”
Daniels v. Traughber, 984 S.W.2d 918 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Applicable Law T.C.A. § 40-28-117 provides in pertinent part as follows: XX-XX-XXX.”
Hopkins v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles & Prob., 60 S.W.3d 79 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “§§ 40-28-117(a), 40-35-503(b) (1997); Arnold v.”
Baldwin v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles, 125 S.W.3d 429 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “§ 40-28-117, which reads in part, (a) Parole being a privilege and not a right, no prisoner shall be released on parole merely as a reward for good conduct or efficient performance of duties assigned in prison, but only if the board is of the opinion that there is reasonable…”
Carvin Thomas v. Richard Montgomery, 140 F.4th 335 (6th Cir. 2025). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117 (a)(1). Additionally, “no inmate convicted shall be granted parole if the board finds that”: (1) There is a substantial risk that the incarcerated individual will not conform to the conditions of the release program; (2)(A) The release from custody…”
Frazier v. Hesson, 40 F. Supp. 2d 957 (W.D. Tenn. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 40-35-503(b) (1990) and Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117 (1990). “Release on parole is a privilege and not a right .”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a): 10 cases
State v. Turner, 297 S.W.3d 155 (Tenn. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a). It is a privilege the State of Tennessee may accord to persons incarcerated for committing serious felonies in spite of worrisome statistics of recidivism.”
Kaylor v. Bradley, 912 S.W.2d 728 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a). Likewise, eligible inmates do not have a vested right to be considered for early release because the governor retains the power to alter the eligibility criteria at any time and because the opportunity to be considered for early release lapses…”
Danny A. Stewart v. Derrick D. Schofield, Comm'r, Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 368 S.W.3d 457 (Tenn. 2012). “, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 40-28-117(a) (2006), 40-35-503(b) (2010); State v.”
State of Tennessee v. Janet Michelle Stanfield, Tony Alan Winsett & Justin Bradley Stanfield, 554 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2018). “§ 40-28-117(a) (2006). Under Tennessee's statutory scheme, persons released outside of prison walls on parole remain in the legal custody of the warden (or relevant penal supervisor) and are subject to all of the provisions upon which their parole is conditioned.”
Hopkins v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles & Prob., 60 S.W.3d 79 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “§§ 40-28-117(a), 40-35-503(b) (1997); Arnold v.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a)(1): 1 case
Townsend v. TN Dept of Corr. (W.D. Tenn. 2020).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117(b): 7 cases
Hickman v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles, 78 S.W.3d 285 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Hickman’s petition, to the extent that it sought judicial relief based on Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117 (b), failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
McIntyre v. Traughber, 884 S.W.2d 134 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). “Acts 612, 614-15, now codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-117(b) (1990). 2 .”
Mohamed Ali v. Bd. of Paroles (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117(b)(2): 2 cases
Eslick v. Campbell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-117(b)(6): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.