Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123 (2026)

Felony committed by parolee or prisoner assigned to release program - Signed acknowledgement prerequisite to participation in release programs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1937, ch. 276, § 13; C. Supp. 1950, § 11818.13 (Williams, § 11843.13); Acts 1961, ch. 289, § 1; 1974, ch. 624, § 9; 1978, ch. 794, § 1; 1979, ch. 359, § 23; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 40-3620; Acts 1985, ch. 220, § 1; 1989, ch. 227, §§ 43, 44; 1998, ch. 1049, §§ 24, 25; 2012 , ch. 727, § 31.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 46 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2022 · leading case: Hogan v. Mills, 168 S.W.3d 753 (Tenn. 2005).
Hogan v. Mills, 168 S.W.3d 753 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 4× “Subpart (A) is the equivalent of Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-28-123(a) (2003), which provides in pertinent part: Any prisoner who is convicted in this state of a felony, committed while on parole from a state prison, jail or workhouse, shall serve the remainder of the…”
Faulkner v. State, 226 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 2× “The governing statute provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Any prisoner who is convicted in this state of a felony, committed while on parole from a state prison, jail or workhouse, shall serve the remainder of the sentence under which the prisoner was paroled .”
Wheeler v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 36 S.W.3d 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 12× “§ 40-28-123 Mr. Wheeler argues on appeal that Tenn.”
Taylor v. Morgan, 909 S.W.2d 17 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “1978) (current version at section 40-28-123 (1989)). This statute requires the sentence for an offense committed by an inmate on work release to be served consecutive to any pre-existing sentence.”
El-Amin v. Campbell, 973 S.W.2d 222 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 40-3620 (now Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-123(a)), which was in effect at that time: Any prisoner who is convicted in this state of a felony, committed while on parole from a state prison, jail or workhouse, shall serve the remainder of the sentence under which the prisoner was…”
Richard P. Rienholtz v. Christine Bradley, Comm'r, Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 945 S.W.2d 727 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “TMs is consistent with the laws of Tennessee, specifically TCA 40-28-123(b)(l). Approximately three months later, Mr.”
State of Tennessee v. Decornick Moore (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 14× “The Defendant argued that concurrent sentences violated Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-28-123 (2012) and Tennessee Criminal Procedure Rule 32(c)(3), which required consecutive service, and that he entered an involuntary and unknowing guilty plea because he was unaware the…”
Roy L. Crawford v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 12× “Crawford had been denied a parole hearing, pursuant to Section 40-28-123. In the answer, the Department asserts that Mr.”
Kent Ousley v. David Mills, Warden (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123 . Citing Henderson v.”
Robert A. Atkins v. James M. Dukes, Warden (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). · cites it 10× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123 (a) (1997) (emphasis added); see also Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Lee Dewane Watts (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 5× “Additionally, Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-28-123 provides that a defendant who is convicted of a felony while on parole shall serve “the remainder of the sentence under which the [defendant] was paroled, or such part of that sentence, as the board may determine before…”
McCamey v. TN. Dept. of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 13× “The plaintiff submitts [sic] the statute pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-28-123 (b), violates constitutional provisions under the Tennessee and United States Constitution.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123(a) — 20 cases
Hogan v. Mills, 168 S.W.3d 753 (Tenn. 2005). “Subpart (A) is the equivalent of Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-28-123(a) (2003), which provides in pertinent part: Any prisoner who is convicted in this state of a felony, committed while on parole from a state prison, jail or workhouse, shall serve the remainder of the…”
Faulkner v. State, 226 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. 2007). “The governing statute provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Any prisoner who is convicted in this state of a felony, committed while on parole from a state prison, jail or workhouse, shall serve the remainder of the sentence under which the prisoner was paroled .”
El-Amin v. Campbell, 973 S.W.2d 222 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 40-3620 (now Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-28-123(a)), which was in effect at that time: Any prisoner who is convicted in this state of a felony, committed while on parole from a state prison, jail or workhouse, shall serve the remainder of the sentence under which the prisoner was…”
Wheeler v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 36 S.W.3d 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 40-28-123 Mr. Wheeler argues on appeal that Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123(b) — 2 cases
Wheeler v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 36 S.W.3d 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 40-28-123 Mr. Wheeler argues on appeal that Tenn.”
McCamey v. TN. Dept. of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “The plaintiff submitts [sic] the statute pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-28-123 (b), violates constitutional provisions under the Tennessee and United States Constitution.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123(b)(1) — 3 cases
Wheeler v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 36 S.W.3d 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 40-28-123 Mr. Wheeler argues on appeal that Tenn.”
Roy L. Crawford v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Crawford had been denied a parole hearing, pursuant to Section 40-28-123. In the answer, the Department asserts that Mr.”
Don Williams v. Donal Campbell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-123(b)(l) — 2 cases
Wheeler v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 36 S.W.3d 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 40-28-123 Mr. Wheeler argues on appeal that Tenn.”
Richard P. Rienholtz v. Christine Bradley, Comm'r, Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 945 S.W.2d 727 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “TMs is consistent with the laws of Tennessee, specifically TCA 40-28-123(b)(l). Approximately three months later, Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.