Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-120 (2026)
Stays of execution when petitioner is under sentence of death
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) When affirming a conviction and sentence of death on direct appeal, the Tennessee supreme court shall contemporaneously set a date for an execution. The date shall be no less than four (4) months from the date of the judgment of the Tennessee supreme court. Upon the filing of a petition for post-conviction relief, the court in which the conviction occurred shall issue a stay of the execution date that shall continue in effect for the duration of any appeals or until the post-conviction action is otherwise final. The execution date shall not be stayed prior to the filing of a petition for post-conviction relief except upon a showing by the petitioner of the petitioner's inability to file a petition prior to the execution date and that the inability is justified by extraordinary circumstances beyond the petitioner's control.
- (b) Where the petitioner is under a sentence of death and the petition is not the first petition under this part attacking that judgment, or a motion to reopen has been filed, no court may stay the execution unless a court of competent jurisdiction first finds that a motion to reopen that meets the requirements set out in § 40-30-117 has been granted.
- (c) The mere satisfaction of the requirements of subsection (b) shall not automatically result in a stay. In order to obtain a stay, an applicant must show that upon the court's consideration of the petition there is a significant possibility that the death sentence will be invalidated and that there is a significant possibility that the death sentence will be carried out before consideration of the petition is concluded.
- (d) Any motion for stay pending consideration of the post-conviction petition must be presented first to the court where the petition is filed. The decision of the court shall be reviewable by the court of criminal appeals upon the filing of a motion for review. Either party may seek review. The lower court's determination shall not be set aside unless the movant demonstrates an abuse of discretion. The action of the court of criminal appeals shall likewise be reviewable upon the filing of a motion for review in the Tennessee supreme court. Either party may seek review. The determination of the court of criminal appeals shall not be set aside unless the movant demonstrates an abuse of discretion.
- (e) Each motion for stay, or motion for review, shall be filed in writing with the clerk of the court to whom the motion is directed. The clerk shall immediately refer the matter to the court. Each motion shall be served upon opposing counsel in the most expeditious manner practicable. The motion shall recite that opposing counsel has been served and in what manner. Oral requests directed to a judge are prohibited unless, owing to emergency circumstances, the filing of a written motion is impractical. In that event, counsel initiating the contact shall orally notify opposing counsel prior to the contact.
- (f) Motions for review may be acted upon by a single judge of the appellate court. The judge may, in lieu thereof, refer the motion to the court. In the court of criminal appeals, the reference will be to a three (3) judge panel of the court in the grand division where the motion is filed. Review shall be made promptly within five (5) days or within a shorter period as necessary to preclude the issue from becoming moot, whether by a single judge or by the court. Oral argument shall not be permitted unless the court otherwise directs. Opposing counsel shall have a right to file a written response to the motion within three (3) days of the service of the motion. If time does not permit the filing of a written response, the court shall ascertain the position of opposing counsel by other means which may include a telephone conference. The court may consider the last-minute nature of an application to stay execution by resolving against the petitioner any doubts and uncertainties as to the sufficiency of the petitioner's submission.
Acts 1995, ch. 207, § 1; T.C.A. § 40-30-220.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1984–2011 · leading case: State v. Swanson, 680 S.W.2d 487 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1984).
State v. Swanson, 680 S.W.2d 487 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1984). “In his fourth and final issue, appellant contends that the trial court erred by holding appellant could not be granted a delayed appeal under T.C.A. § 40-30-120. Under this statute, the trial judge can grant a delayed appeal if the judge finds that the petitioner was…”
State v. Dodson, 780 S.W.2d 778 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1989). “First, the appellant could have sought post-conviction relief pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-120. Second, the appellant could have filed a motion in this Court requesting that the timely filing of a notice of appeal be waived in the interest of jus *781 tice.”
Pike v. State, 164 S.W.3d 257 (Tenn. 2005). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-120(a) (2003) provides in relevant part: When affirming a conviction and sentence of death on direct appeal, the Tennessee supreme court shall contemporaneously set a date for an execution.”
Handley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 223 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). “…from his original conviction in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of Tennessee. Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-120 (1990).”
Crittenden v. State, 978 S.W.2d 929 (Tenn. 1998). “The petition for post-conviction relief alleged that a delayed appeal was warranted under Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-120 (1990) because the trial attorney provided ineffective representation.”
State v. Cameron, 909 S.W.2d 836 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “Here, we find that the trial court properly granted the appellant a delayed appeal in accordance with T.C.A. § 40-30-120, and we now consider on the merits the issues raised by the appellant.”
State v. Weeden, 733 S.W.2d 124 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “See T.C.A. § 40-30-120; T.R.A.P. 42. The delayed appeal was granted when the trial court found that appellant, through no fault of his own, lost first-tier review.”
Wilson v. State, 724 S.W.2d 766 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1986). “TCA § 40-30-120(a)(l). While we have no transcript of the post-conviction relief proceeding, the order granting the delayed appeal shows on its face that there was no finding of any deprivation of any of the appellant’s rights under either constitution.”
Off. of Disciplinary Couns. v. McKinney, 668 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1984). “The Criminal Court authorized the late filing of a motion for a new trial pursuant to T.C.A. 40-30-120(3), but otherwise denied the petition.”
Cole v. State, 858 S.W.2d 915 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-120 . All other issues were dismissed.”
Michael Douglas Hughes v. State of Tennessee, 77 S.W.3d 801 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “Provisions of T.C.A. 40-30-120[sic], direct that a Petitioner who is denied his right to appeal is entitled to a delayed appeal.”
Paul Dennis Reid, Jr. v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). “§ 40-30-120 (a) (formerly 40-30-220(a)) (“When affirming a conviction and sentence of death on direct appeal, the Tennessee supreme court shall contemporaneously set a date for an execution. The date shall be no less than four (4) months from the date of the judgment of the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-120(3) — 1 case
Off. of Disciplinary Couns. v. McKinney, 668 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1984). “The Criminal Court authorized the late filing of a motion for a new trial pursuant to T.C.A. 40-30-120(3), but otherwise denied the petition.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-120(a) — 1 case
Pike v. State, 164 S.W.3d 257 (Tenn. 2005). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-120(a) (2003) provides in relevant part: When affirming a conviction and sentence of death on direct appeal, the Tennessee supreme court shall contemporaneously set a date for an execution.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-120(a)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Swanson, 680 S.W.2d 487 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1984). “In his fourth and final issue, appellant contends that the trial court erred by holding appellant could not be granted a delayed appeal under T.C.A. § 40-30-120. Under this statute, the trial judge can grant a delayed appeal if the judge finds that the petitioner was…”
Wilson v. State, 724 S.W.2d 766 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1986). “TCA § 40-30-120(a)(l). While we have no transcript of the post-conviction relief proceeding, the order granting the delayed appeal shows on its face that there was no finding of any deprivation of any of the appellant’s rights under either constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.