Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (2026)

Rights of crime victims and prosecution witnesses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1990, ch. 957, § 2; 1993, ch. 527, § 2; 1996, ch. 1044, § 1; 2001, ch. 370, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: The Tennessean v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 485 S.W.3d 857 (Tenn. 2016).
The Tennessean v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 485 S.W.3d 857 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 11× “3 The Victims‘ Bill of Rights, Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-102, provides that the rights of victims of crimes include the right to be treated with dignity and compassion; have protection and support with prompt action in the case of intimidation or retaliation from…”
State v. Ring, 56 S.W.3d 577 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “CONCLUSION We conclude that a trial court must allow a victim to provide the court with victim impact testimony pursuant to the “Victim’s Impact Statement Act” and/or Tennessee Code Annotated sections 40-38-102(a)(2) and 40-35-209(b).”
Clata Renee Brewer v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 9× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (a)(1). The TPRA provides that public records shall be open “for personal inspection by any citizen of this state .”
The Tennessean v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. - Dissenting (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 8× “‖); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (a)(1) (―All victims of crime .”
State of Tennessee v. Hassan Falah Al Mutory (Tenn. 2019). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (a)(1). It protects a victim’s right to restitution by providing that “[i]n addition to the punishment .”
State of Tennessee v. Hassan Falah Al Mutory (Tenn. 2019). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (a)(1). It protects a victim’s right to restitution by providing that “[i]n addition to the punishment .”
State v. Robert D. Ring (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “CONCLUSION We conclude that a trial court must allow a victim to provide the court with victim impact testimony pursuant to the “Victim’s Impact Statement Act” and/or Tennessee Code Annotated sections 40-38-102(a)(2) and 40-35-209(b).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102(a)(1): 2 cases
The Tennessean v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. - Dissenting (Tenn. 2016). “‖); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (a)(1) (―All victims of crime .”
Clata Renee Brewer v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102 (a)(1). The TPRA provides that public records shall be open “for personal inspection by any citizen of this state .”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102(a)(2): 2 cases
State v. Ring, 56 S.W.3d 577 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “CONCLUSION We conclude that a trial court must allow a victim to provide the court with victim impact testimony pursuant to the “Victim’s Impact Statement Act” and/or Tennessee Code Annotated sections 40-38-102(a)(2) and 40-35-209(b).”
State v. Robert D. Ring (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “CONCLUSION We conclude that a trial court must allow a victim to provide the court with victim impact testimony pursuant to the “Victim’s Impact Statement Act” and/or Tennessee Code Annotated sections 40-38-102(a)(2) and 40-35-209(b).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102(a)(l): 1 case
The Tennessean v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 485 S.W.3d 857 (Tenn. 2016). “3 The Victims‘ Bill of Rights, Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-102, provides that the rights of victims of crimes include the right to be treated with dignity and compassion; have protection and support with prompt action in the case of intimidation or retaliation from…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-102(á)(l): 1 case
The Tennessean v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 485 S.W.3d 857 (Tenn. 2016). “3 The Victims‘ Bill of Rights, Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-102, provides that the rights of victims of crimes include the right to be treated with dignity and compassion; have protection and support with prompt action in the case of intimidation or retaliation from…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.