Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121 (2026)

Safekeeping of prisoners - Pregnant prisoners - Sufficient jails

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1017, s 1, eff. 5/11/2022.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1045, Secs.s 1, s 2eff. 5/21/2018.

Code 1858, §§ 5402-5404 (deriv. Acts 1809 (Sept.), ch. 126, § 4; 1817, ch. 17, § 1); Shan., §§ 7380-7382; Code 1932, §§ 11989-11991; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 41-1123 -- 41-1125.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: State v. Walker, 905 S.W.2d 554 (Tenn. 1995).
State v. Walker, 905 S.W.2d 554 (Tenn. 1995). · cites it 8× “But what of Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121 allowing a sheriff to convey prisoners to the nearest jail "sufficient" for their safekeeping? The term "prisoner" as used in this section refers to persons sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail.”
State v. Chapman, 977 S.W.2d 122 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 40-23-103, and that the sheriff has the authority “to convey prisoners to the nearest jail ‘sufficient’ for their safekeeping,” see T.C.A. § 41-4-121, our supreme court held that when a convicted person is turned away after presenting him or herself for immediate…”
State of Tennessee v. Austin Drummond (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). · cites it 10× “On November 13, 2025, the trial court entered an amended order relying upon Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-4-121. The trial court specifically found that “the Lake County jail is insufficient to house and keep safe this inmate, and no other jail or detention facility, located…”
Charles Montague v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “Code section 41-4-121, which deals with the power of the sheriff to house inmates in nearby facilities “when the jail of the county is insufficient for the safekeeping of a prisoner,” has no application to this case.”
Larry J. Noel v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121 (2010). -9- The petitioner argues that his pretrial confinement in the penitentiary was “punitive,” rather than remedial, and thereby violative of the prohibition against double jeopardy, because “Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-4-121 does not provide…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121(a): 2 cases
State v. Walker, 905 S.W.2d 554 (Tenn. 1995). “But what of Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121 allowing a sheriff to convey prisoners to the nearest jail "sufficient" for their safekeeping? The term "prisoner" as used in this section refers to persons sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail.”
Charles Montague v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “Code section 41-4-121, which deals with the power of the sheriff to house inmates in nearby facilities “when the jail of the county is insufficient for the safekeeping of a prisoner,” has no application to this case.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121(a)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Austin Drummond (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). “On November 13, 2025, the trial court entered an amended order relying upon Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-4-121. The trial court specifically found that “the Lake County jail is insufficient to house and keep safe this inmate, and no other jail or detention facility, located…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121(a)(3): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Austin Drummond (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). “On November 13, 2025, the trial court entered an amended order relying upon Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-4-121. The trial court specifically found that “the Lake County jail is insufficient to house and keep safe this inmate, and no other jail or detention facility, located…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-4-121(b): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Austin Drummond (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). “On November 13, 2025, the trial court entered an amended order relying upon Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-4-121. The trial court specifically found that “the Lake County jail is insufficient to house and keep safe this inmate, and no other jail or detention facility, located…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.