Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 42-3-101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Airport Authorities Act."
Acts 1957, ch. 376, § 22; T.C.A., § 42-601.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1990–2008 · leading case: Metaljan v. Memphis-Shelby Cnty. Airport Auth., 752 F. Supp. 834 (W.D. Tenn. 1990).
Metaljan v. Memphis-Shelby Cnty. Airport Auth., 752 F. Supp. 834 (W.D. Tenn. 1990). “In this case, plaintiff is a resident of the State of Mississippi and the MSCAA is deemed a citizen of the State of Tennessee, being an airport authority organized and created pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 42-3-101, et seq. Plaintiff asserts jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Rufus Reese (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Ronald R. Dunn (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Robert G. Ingrum (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Rebecca Warren (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Nikki Wallace (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Michael Rippy (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. James R. Stephenson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. James Lassiter (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Fred Thomas McKee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Fred P. Walter (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. Charles Carter (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “18 Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 42-3-101 to -205 (2000).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.